you agree or disagree? I guess they only like scantily dressed women.
2007-10-27 03:56:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Well, you have to consider the source. Maxim caters to neanderthals. Beyond football, skanky women, big trucks, big tv's and beer, Maxim readers have nothing else in life. Sarah Jessica Parker is a beautiful accomplished actress who wouldn't even lower herself to date a Maxim reader, much less pay attention to what that trash rag magazine says.
2007-10-27 04:54:52 · answer #1 · answered by ana2rosa2003 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To be a celeb you go with a thick pores and skin. Why ought to everybody, noticeably someone so achieved as SJP, pay interest to an unscientific adult males's mag "poll." The more suitable she talks about it, the more suitable publicity it receives, even as it might in simple terms die away. She must have in simple terms laughed it off; she would not go with to justify to everybody that she isn't "unsexy."
2016-10-23 01:52:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's because Maxim, and other magazines like that, only admire women that dye their hair an unnatural shade of blonde, wear little or no clothing, are full of plastic, silicone, Botox, and Restylane, and have the IQ of a piss-ant. Men are pigs (well, not all men!).
2007-10-27 05:15:09 · answer #3 · answered by But Inside I'm Screaming 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is how it goes. The guys into Maxim want "hot women" . They always hold "Maxim" with one hand, you know what I mean.
Sarah Jessica Parker is one beautiful, bright and articulate woman who should be on a pedestal.
2007-10-27 04:09:34 · answer #4 · answered by Will 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think she is pretty and a fashion icon. Yeah only the skankily dressed women get featured on mens magazines anyways.
2007-10-27 03:59:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Huh...I wouldn't have dubbed her as the unsexiest. But she is the kinda person who is attractive because she wears great clothes. Put her in something plain, and she wouldn't look very sexy at all. And really, I don't know if she dresses well, or if it was just her Sex & the City carachter that was so fashion savvy....So, I guess I could see why she would be on the list, but I wouldn't put her at the top.
2007-10-27 04:02:38 · answer #6 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Oh my god, how can they say this? admittedly she does look a bit long faced sometimes but she's my idol!!
She's far better looking than half the women in these magazines who just look dog ugly plastered in make up and no clothes!
2007-10-27 04:01:16 · answer #7 · answered by SaRaH 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Maxim was spot on with that one. i completely agree. Shes very unsexy.
But if i ever put on a play of the Wizard of Oz she would be my #1 pick for wicked witch. With that huge wart on her chin and that long nose i'd save a ton on makeup.
her bodys thin an awkward too.
good actress tho. Just not pretty. everybody cant be.
2007-10-27 04:47:40 · answer #8 · answered by jean grey 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
i admire the fact she has enough confidence in herself not to have to resort to plastic surgery,she may not be the most beautiful woman in the world,but i think she is certainly unique,and stands out for that reason
2007-10-27 04:53:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
She could be the nicest woman in the world, the smartest, the best dressed, whatever. The problem is that her face is... the problem IS her face. She's ugly and ugly is not sexy. It has nothing to do with how she dresses.
2007-10-27 04:04:52 · answer #10 · answered by Chloe 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋