Isnt this considered wrong, or should mankind use science to do as they please.!!
I mean medicine is good, but should u create life ?
2007-10-26 13:01:38 · 9 answers · asked by robby o 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If a bunch of chemicals could create life by themselves, I think it's only fair that we humans have a pop at it. Seeing as God doesn't exist, it's not as if we're intruding on anyone's territory.
2007-10-26 13:06:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Should they create life?
I think if science creates life, it's really God that gives the life to it. You can't really credit science for life. There is no life without God. It's still another creation story.
Morally though, a human child needs to grow up with love or it really doesn't have a chance. A child needs to grow up with love or will never know the love of God, or any love for that matter.
So really, shouldn't procreation be the result of love in the first place?!
2007-10-26 13:27:49 · answer #2 · answered by wise1 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No God spent a long time first to ensure that their life would be pleasant. He made a lush garden with plenty to eat and made a body that enabled him to do many things. It was so good in fact that the angels were jealous and wanted to be humans.
God just wanted mankind to live and enjoy life. would it be better to just go away and not live?
They saw the animals die so they knew what old age and death was. He said, he had the right to make laws and knew that laws would be needed when more people were born on the earth. Certain things were his to desnigate.
So to get them started out right he said, "that tree is mine, don't touch it." that let them know some things wouldn't be theres. But they failed that test and so we see what happens when everyone just does what he wants to.
2007-10-26 13:09:55 · answer #3 · answered by cloud 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First, we does not be "coming up" existence. that's unscientific. existence does not take place from nonliving aspects. this variety of ingredient is named "abiogenesis" and it rather is unscientific. What we would be doing is taking already-living aspects, and PROCREATING human existence from it. study the version. Cloning does not furnish an evidence as to how existence starts off. Cloning is a procreative technique, not a inventive one. So, your implication on your question info, that a technique or the different cloning can disprove God's introduction, isn't sensible. Get serious.
2016-10-02 21:25:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
God took that Job a long time ago,to creat human,s and
no one should mess with life but God who gave it.
2007-10-26 13:10:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not believe that humans
have the knowledge to alter
human life in a safe way. To
do that, we would have to know
everything about humans. We do
not. So it would be wrong at this
stage.
2007-10-26 13:51:35 · answer #6 · answered by PokerChip 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they ever start cloning humans... I think they would clone great sports figures just to make money at it. I think that is totally unethical
2007-10-26 13:09:37 · answer #7 · answered by Tommiecat 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in answer to your question:
Nyet
to me it's like the laboratory where they "created" Frankenstein's Monster
2007-10-26 13:13:33 · answer #8 · answered by sego lily 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THOSE THAT PLAY GOD, WILL BE PUNISHED BY GOD HIMSELF!!
2007-10-26 14:11:06 · answer #9 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋