2007-10-26 11:16:58 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Lust.? I don't think so...
2007-10-26 11:19:42 · answer #1 · answered by ~☆ Petit ♥ Chou ☆~ 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Lust is not the issue, lusting for what can never belong to us is. Because none of us would do mostly anything without desire. We desire to eat, so we do. We desire sex, so we have it. We desire sleep, so we catch zzzzs.
But what if we desired someone else's truck or someone elses' wife...most of us would NOT pursue it, but think about the times when people lusted over something they couldn't have? It led to heartbreak. (do the names Scott Peterson or Chris Oxley ring a bell?)
Lust or covetousness is not bad..Please covet and lust over your wife. The book of Proverbs goes into quite specific detail of how you would. But lusting over something that can never be yours would, on a good day, just make you longingly hurt. On a bad day, you could act out and be jailed or killed or break someone's heart....
2007-10-26 11:23:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
between husband and wife its not lust ..lust is when you have thoughts about the woman at work or down the street or at walmart. thats a sin. but all religions that follow the Holy Bible believes lust is a sin.
2007-10-26 11:30:44 · answer #3 · answered by revbill_ussery 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think most religions just object to "lust" when it's taken outside the boundaries of marriage.
2007-10-26 11:19:53 · answer #4 · answered by Emily Dew 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This phrase states: to have the lust for OUR Partner!! Not every other person of the oppisite sex.
2007-10-26 11:21:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
You take a lawful wedded partner so as to control your lust!
2007-10-26 11:19:47 · answer #6 · answered by Premaholic 7 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Lust of the flesh is only bad when it overrides God's laws. It's merely a matter of priorities. God first, then everything else.
2007-10-26 11:19:47 · answer #7 · answered by Mutations Killed Darwin Fish 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The bible tells us that girls persons could desire to gown modestly. little question the reason at the back of it somewhat is to sidestep the lust to which you refer.Modest would not propose to the extremes that some international places bypass the place women persons are shrouded in fabric from head to toe, notwithstanding it ability retaining inner maximum that it somewhat is meant for below the husband to verify. Gastoune, it somewhat is a planned misinterpretation of the observe 'love'. do you be attentive to what proportion diverse words there are in the Greek language for our one inferior observe 'love'. The English language fails us right here. in case you prefer to be attentive to what the bible meant by utilising the observe love (as you quote it) lookup the unique Greek of that sentence. you are going to be able to nicely be enlightened. in case you're actually not attracted to looking the fact please refrain from ill and blasphemous comments approximately Jesus. we can be held in charge for each idle observe we communicate. Matthew 12:36 yet I say unto you, that each and each idle observe that adult men shall communicate, they shall supply account thereof in the day of judgment.
2016-09-27 23:01:14 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lust for people other than our spouse is a sin. Lust for our spouse is good!
2007-10-26 11:21:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If there really were a god... let us all agree that testosterone wouldn't exist. He created us sick and demands us to be well at risk of everlasting torture. What kind of a god is this and why do so many people believe it?
2007-10-26 11:22:22 · answer #10 · answered by Earl Grey 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Christianity
2007-10-26 11:19:30 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋