If we spent as much money on health care, alternitive energy, education, mass transit in rual america, rail service instead of trucking everything like it used to be, conservation instead of mass waste, tax religious foundations, in their proerty and investments, when most of them only contribute 35 cents on the dollar that they receive anyway to whom ever they are saying it will go to, equal tax according to income of executives and companies, same tax to federal employees as well as social security that federal employees do not pay, stop wasting money on going to other planets, in which their is no practical motive other than curiosity, use small nucular reactors in rail engines like we do in our navy ships and submariens, that get 40 years on one fill up. unlimited world wide milage. not allow the federal govt. to use social security tax income for anything other than benifits to the investors. if you like that, vote for mlw12342001@yahoo.com for president. thank you. write in.
2007-10-26 11:05:52 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Executive Summary
Numerous studies have documented the fact that illegal immigrants are a significant fiscal burden on local communities. Because the burden is related to the low wages earned by this population and that is unlikely to change as long as the earnings do not rise more than inflation, any Congressional amnesty-type action that incorporates these foreign workers and allows or admits additional ones will not only perpetuate the fiscal burden, it will increase it.
FAIR estimates the current local annual costs of illegal immigration from just three program areas — educating the children in public primary and secondary schools, providing medical services in emergency rooms, and incarceration — amount to about $36 billion. If the population of foreign low wage workers is allowed to increase as a result of not effectively denying new illegal immigrants access American jobs, current illegal immigrants are allowed to stay and bring their relatives to join them, and additional low wage workers are allowed into the country in a new guest worker program the costs to local communities will increase. Our estimate is that the annual fiscal costs in 2010 would increase by nearly 70 percent to $61.5 billion for just these same three program areas. The amount would swell by an additional nearly 73 percent to $106.3 billion by 2020
2007-10-27 11:05:06 · answer #1 · answered by edwinjoel22 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your lost. Half of what you are saying doesn't even make sense.
It is just one big run on sentence.
I definitely don't understand how your point has to do with Americans letting go of their greed.
How is letting the government take 35% of what you earn and give it to someone else holding onto greed?
2007-10-26 11:17:44 · answer #2 · answered by QBeing 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
As to your initial question, the answer is, When they stop being human.
As to the rest, this doesn't seem to me to be greed, but rather a redistribution of wealth. This will happen when the country stops rewarding greed, and therefore our economy stops, and we have breadlines.
As to you being President, I think you are too young, and if you aren't, I'm sorry.
2007-10-27 01:57:59 · answer #3 · answered by maryjellerson 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
you missed investing in prisons instead of schools
2007-10-26 11:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
dude, are you imbibing in some rare hawaiian gold?
2007-10-26 11:27:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I will totally vote for you dude!
2007-10-26 11:13:31 · answer #6 · answered by xsweety_piex 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Never Never...I want it all!
2007-10-27 08:29:38 · answer #7 · answered by tom_allen95 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋