did adam and eve have belly buttons??
2007-10-26 05:09:22 · 13 answers · asked by tammy b 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Of course they did. They were fictional characters. Fictional characters mostly have belly buttons, right?
2007-10-26 05:11:47 · answer #1 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is actually a kind of fun and interesting question.
I've never thought about it, but I bet they didn't, since they weren't "born" and there was no need to cut the umbilical cord resulting in a belly button.
Can you imagine what Cain and Abel's belly buttons looked like?? They were probably really screwed up since it was the first time anyone had ever made a belly button. LOL!
2007-10-26 12:14:56 · answer #2 · answered by Kiwi 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't know. I guess not if they were created to be adults from the start.
Since you need an umbilical cord and all to form a belly button.
2007-10-26 12:19:35 · answer #3 · answered by Emperor Insania Says Bye! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Before the fall they had spiritual bodies living in the light of God's grace. After the fall they fell into nature which made reproduction possible. The kids had buttons.
2007-10-26 12:14:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, all paintings of Adam and Eve portray them with belly buttons, so I guess you can't argue with that. :)
http://www.google.ca/images?q=adam%20and%20eve
2007-10-26 12:18:53 · answer #5 · answered by Belzetot 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How could they?
Belly buttons are the remnants of umbilical cords... and neither of them were "born" by definition.
I find it even funnier that Primoa would say they would since I recall once that he said exactly the opposite as a means of telling them apart from other people in Heaven.
2007-10-26 12:13:48 · answer #6 · answered by Lucid Interrogator 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What does that have to do with anything?
I'm sure they did...........they were the first human beings ever created.
Edit:
Lucid.....do you really think that we are going to look and see if we have belly buttons in order to tell who's who in heaven?
2007-10-26 12:11:56 · answer #7 · answered by primoa1970 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
yes
2007-10-26 12:17:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yesssssssssss!!! This question is weird.
2007-10-26 12:14:36 · answer #9 · answered by be.like.an.angel 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No They were anatomically incorrect.
2007-10-26 12:13:09 · answer #10 · answered by billblasphemy 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋