English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What country, organization, or person do you think is the biggest threat to use chemical weapons on the US? Please give reasons for your answer.

2007-10-26 03:03:43 · 11 answers · asked by LC 5 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

The U.S. has many chemical weapons...Some of them are like flu symptoms that can not be detected// It is to believe that when there is an outbreak of any type such as Salmonela, MRSA etc...it is the goverment testing this weapon on their population...but that is just a rummor...
Remember that chemical weapons are silence and deathly...you might be infected and not even know it...
Some other middle east country test more serious chemicals like gas agents on some remote area...

2007-10-26 03:16:36 · answer #1 · answered by Burt 7 · 0 3

Potential political backlash would keep most nations from using biological or chemical weapons unless it was using them to retaliate against the same type of attack. The most likely sources of a chemical or biological weapon attack would be from a non-state sponsered (terrorist) group. This has already been the case in several countries. The Unisted States was attacked with antrax, Japan suffered serveral attacks with sarin gas by the Aum Shinrikyo group, and Iraq has seen car and truck bombs built to deploy chloriene gas to some effect.

Of course the Chemical Weapons Convention also states specifically the non-leathal agents such as CS and tear gas are classified as chemical weapons as well. These are used by many nations on a daily basis.

2007-10-26 04:20:57 · answer #2 · answered by Mohammed F 4 · 0 0

North Korea would be the largest threat. Since North Korea is separated from all other country that no one can really tell what's going on with their warfare and the recent declaration of testing a chemical weapon, it is the largest threat for any country simply because of how North Korea deals with information dissemination that is possible for other countries not to be prepared or have counter attacks against those weapons known only to them.

2007-10-26 03:07:56 · answer #3 · answered by Arvi 2 · 2 1

america of a are 'allowed' Nuclear weapons because of the fact: a million) They have been partly in charge for there advent in the process the manhattan undertaking 2) The chilly conflict (1947-ninety one) between Russia and america of a created a 'Nuclear hands race' that brought on the 'want' for Nuclear 'deterrent'. 3) ultimately they seem to be a democracy. country voters choose the occasion to control them in accordance with their stance on national themes, which includes Nuclear weapons coverage In connection with their complaint of North Korea's Nuclear weapons progression: a million) america of a used the only 2 Nuclear weapons on Japan after their ask your self attack on Pearl Harbour killed 2402 people. 2) North Korea is a Communist country, who thoroughly refuse to renowned international regulation or treaties. They word no freedom of speech rules or human rights rules. this could be a extra precise description of an 'volatile country' 3) North Korea has one, un-elected chief. the persons have not any enter into government coverage. they don't get to vote. the two on how their country could desire to run, or who could desire to run it. might you have faith Nuclear weaponry to a minimum of one guy who feels he needs to make an 'effect' at something of the international? america of a ain't appropriate, yet they gained't be spontaneously commencing a Nuclear conflict each time quickly. North Korea merely might. subsequently why america of a (and something of the international) are actually not too satisfied.

2016-12-15 09:43:00 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I believe that it would be a person that has gone quite mad with their own hatred or through abuse etc.
Some humans can deal with pressure and others haven't the intelligence to ride through it. If a person can see no options they create them and people of less intelligence can be quite fundemental and base in their approach to a solution.
I have things in my mind that cannot be discussed on a site like this for various reasons - the largest being security.
All society's and radicals should have options given them to deter from any anarchistic ideals!

2007-10-26 03:22:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

America followed by Russia, this is because they have the largest stockpiles of chemical weapons, and while North Korea is always labeled a threat, it doesn't have the capability to make many chemical weapons.

2007-10-26 03:11:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

China. It has been pretty easy for them to kill our animals with bad food and harm our children with lead paint. They have direct access through our borders with trade. Iran, North Korea, Russia cannot be ruled out.

2007-10-26 03:24:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

USA. Thousands of american soldiers are still suffering from the effects of Agent Orange they had to use in Vietnam

2007-10-26 05:28:44 · answer #8 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0 1

iran has a very large stockpile bought from france,germany,russia and china

2007-10-26 06:20:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

George W. Bush

2007-10-26 03:06:53 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers