English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

he is the father...

2007-11-02 20:39:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Interesting question. But he did technically create Jesus without a biological father. Also, Jesus IS God. God became human to humble himself before us and so that he had mortality to die for our sins.

God exists as a three parts, the Trinity: God, the Holy Spirit, and Jesus. All three were present even at the creation of the world:

Genesis 1:26 "Then God said, "Let US make man in our image, in our likeness, and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground."

Genesis 3:22 "And the LORD God said, "The man has now become like one of US, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever."

2007-10-25 23:46:40 · answer #2 · answered by Curious J, Esq. 6 · 0 2

Jesus is God in the Second Person, and like the Father and the Holy Spirit, He ALWAYS was and He always will be. Jesus became incarnate to redeem us from eternal punishment for our sins. Sin came into the world through man, and it is through the man-God [Jesus] that mankind was saved. This was the divine will of God the Father.

2007-10-25 23:41:10 · answer #3 · answered by WC 7 · 0 1

First, "great" is analyzing scripture no longer analyzing. the Messiah became the prophesied chief of Israel. occasion of words: the final is the optimal rank of all of the army. the final remains of, or area of the army. Firstborn of all creation, makes Jesus of creation, or area of creation, in basic terms simply by fact the final is a element of the army. Col a million:17 he's the initiating, the firstborn from the ineffective, lower back Paul facilitates understand that firstborn denotes 'initiating' Rev 3:14 The Amen, the truthful and genuine Witness, the initiating of the creation of God, "by utilising" is utilized in Col a million a similar way as this expression. "the letter got here by utilising messenger" all of us be conscious of that the messenger became no longer the author of the message, in basic terms the channel that the message got here by utilising. Jesus is discribed as God's grasp worker Prov 8:22 “The LORD possessed me on the initiating of His way, earlier His works of old. 23 “From eternal i became popular, From the initiating, from the earliest cases of the earth. 24 “whilst there have been no depths i became further forth, whilst there have been no springs abounding with water. 25 “earlier the mountains have been settled, earlier the hills i became further forth; 26 jointly as He had no longer yet made the earth and the fields, Nor the 1st airborne dirt and mud of the international. 27 “whilst He popular the heavens, i became there, whilst He inscribed a circle on the face of the deep, 28 whilst He made company the skies above, whilst the springs of the deep grew to grow to be fastened, 29 whilst He set for the sea its boundary so as that the water does not transgress His command, whilst He marked out the guidelines of the earth; 30 Then i became beside Him, as a grasp workman; finally seem up the definitions of 'create' and 'beget' They the two have the meaning "to reason to exist" So whilst the bible calls Jesus, Adam, and the angels 'sons' of God, it does no longer recommend that God had sexual kin with somebody. It means that God, brought about those persons to exist. It additionally shows the close relationship God needs together with his clever creation. unique sin is yet another subject remember, digital mail me in case you like. .

2016-10-14 02:22:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

it wasn't meant to be like that, for JOHN 1: 1 the bible says---in the beginning was the word and the word was with GOD and the word was GOD! (YOU DO KNOW WHO THE WORD IS RIGHT?),, I got some beef with questionable mark if your gonna use a verse in the bible the least you can do is get it RIGHT, the BIBLE states in REVELATION 22: 19 that you are not to remove anything that has already been put in it! (BIBLE). YOU said that in GENESIS 3:22 something about not reaching, or that your not allowed. this is wrong for the bible says this GENESIS 3: 22 And the LORD GOD said, behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil; and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of LIFE, and eat, and LIVE forever. that's how it is stated not like the way you said it. check yourself, before you wreck yourself! just thought you might want to know that

2007-10-26 00:15:37 · answer #5 · answered by trinity 3 · 0 1

I think Adam's "birth" was far more miraculous than Christ's. Look at him; mud brought to life, and he was the first and only man to give birth -- to a full grown woman from his rib. Is that cool or what? Christ didn't do that. I also think Elijah's death was far more spectacular in that fiery chariot. He didn't even have to die and get a new body to go to heaven.

2007-10-25 23:45:28 · answer #6 · answered by jaicee 6 · 1 1

God entered the world as men do to show a life of example. You can live sinless. God also wanted to fellowship with us and still does.

He wants you to come to him and be saved

2007-10-25 23:41:52 · answer #7 · answered by jesussaves 7 · 0 1

I'm sure he could have. He wanted Jesus to be better able to have the complete human experience.

2007-10-25 23:38:20 · answer #8 · answered by Linda B 6 · 1 1

Adam and eve are fictitious, mythological creatures. So where does that leave your question?

2007-10-25 23:40:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

of course jesus was bought without a dad dear

2007-10-25 23:38:42 · answer #10 · answered by cool_shbs 3 · 1 1

the story of creation is just that, a story. There is no indisputable proof that creation ever happened.

2007-10-25 23:52:35 · answer #11 · answered by Imagine No Religion 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers