No hope...sigh
2007-10-25 22:42:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It could be 28 minutes from now or 280 years from now. When the superpowers square off against each other in two camps, then come back and we'll talk apacolpse.
Until then, just think regional conflicts, wars between rump states, proxy wars and brinksmanship. If you recall the Yom Kippur War in 1973, a coalition of Arab States (Egypt, Syria and Jordan) were soundly defeated by the Israelis. That was a worse situation than the current conflict and it didn't raise a blip on the world war radar (not that it didn't have the potential to spark a global war).
The next World War will involve a nuclear exchange, how could it not. In the first 30 minutes, nearly a billion people will have been vaporised, mostly in the US, Russia, Europe, China and Japan. Another 1.5 billion will die shortly thereafter from radiation poisoning. The northern hemisphere will be plunged into prolonged agony and barbarity.
Eventually the nuclear winter will spread to the southern hemisphere and all plant life will die. You ask when is the apacolypse, you are asking when will we commit global suicide. My answer is it won't happen soon because the larger superpowers are more rational than the rump states in the middle east.
Our biggest risk is an accidental launch of nukes by one of the nuclear powers.
2007-10-26 14:22:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nuclear war would be started by a third or fourth world country trying to black mail the world for it's wants and desires. Iran, North Korea Pakistan, India etc etc.....
options are strike first with surgical nuke to minimize damage to property and population. Take out the crazy leaders......If massive strike against each other could place all of us back to the 1800's
2007-10-25 22:54:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There already was.....WWII, we used nukes against Japan.
As for a full-out nuclear exchange in a war, I doubt there will be on, since the breakup of the Soviet Union. There is a good possibility of a nuke or couple of nukes being used though......
by terrorists
by a country such as Pakistan or Israel
by the U.S. (again) this time small tactical 'battlefield nukes.
2007-10-25 23:14:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm more suitable anxious Iran ought to apply nukes. N. Korea likely would not use any until eventually they're attacked, inspite of being chilly conflict loopy. Iran is loopy in yet another, more suitable particular way. both way, a nutter with a bomb is a situation. we would want to continually enable Israel have more suitable leash and enable them bomb a number of Iran's nuclear labs.
2016-10-23 00:33:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by ecker 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The recent fires in California, equal the damage of about a 1 megaton bomb. Los Angels alone, could expect to be hit my 30 or 40 1 to 10 megaton bombs.
2007-10-25 22:50:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by told_wife_checking_mail 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. Every nation is wary about the result nuclear war will bring. Also, love of fellow men will stop war.
2007-10-25 22:47:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by nanding 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there is nuclear war it will be caused by that rogue power, the USA, in an effort to extend their imperialist domination around the globe.
2007-10-25 23:18:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Trevor S 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
If Iran gets a Nuc they will test it in Isral.
Isral will Nuc Iran, Russia will Nuc Isral, USA will Nuc Russia. By by...
2007-10-25 22:50:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
nope
2007-10-26 06:56:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋