Nuclear War?

Question

have you ever wondered why we havent had a nuclear war in over 30 years of warmongering? I believe highly evolved extra
terestials are protecting us. Call me a loon , I really dont care.

Answer 1

You're a loon, most rational leaders (including the war mongering generals) do not believe in global suicide. As long as the rational people have their finger on the button, then we're safe. The risk of nuclear war will come from an accidental launch or possession of a nuke by a rogue state or leader....

Answer 2

Well certainly nobody wants to die, nor lose a war for that matter. Launching a full blown nuclear war would be suicide for the entire world. Anybody with the least bit of a sane mind wouldn't think about starting a nuclear holocaust. The only ones you really need to worry about setting off nukes are terrorist groups.

Answer 3

Nope, the only nations who could deliver Nukes long range, Russia, China, US and Brittan, knew that if one fired missiles, they would be wiped out at the end of the day. It was called MAD or Mutual Assured Destruction.

Small countries like India, Pakistan, Iran and the rest, don't have ICBM's, and should they get them, then in their minds, taking us out, even though we would turn their country into a dead zone, is worth it.

Even the Russian leaders, didn't like the stand-off, but were not crazy enough to push the issue. Iran, Syria and who knows who else, wouldn't care.

Answer 4

i'm more suitable anxious Iran ought to apply nukes. N. Korea likely would not use any until eventually they're attacked, inspite of being chilly conflict loopy. Iran is loopy in yet another, more suitable particular way. both way, a nutter with a bomb is a situation. we would want to continually enable Israel have more suitable leash and enable them bomb a number of Iran's nuclear labs.

Answer 5

Your an uninformed loon - nukes have been around over 60 years

Answer 6

starting a nuclear war would be mutually assured destuction. then if any one survived the initial destruction they would have to deal with fallout and nuclear winter. nations know this and although they hate each other they would not destroy the world to destroy an enemy

Answer 7

No, we actually have intelligent people controlling when to fire those weapons and who understand the consequences of using them.

Answer 8

You're a loon. Scientology anyone? ;)

Answer 9

Nuclear BOOM was used by USA against JAPAN and earned credit of being SOLE USER OF ATOM BOMB.

All understood that USA is on driver seat of NUCLEAR WORLD.

All can use it only for PEACE (except USA).

Like POOR India is making deal with USA for peaceful use by POOR Indian.

Why?

INDIA GO NUCLEAR - Why, How, When What ?

TO MEET ENERGY NEED AFTER 60 YEARS India shall go nuclear and sign treaty like 123 / NPT.

Is nuclear deal of India with US is really worth? It worth down the line of 50 - 60 years.

[A}.-Why worth ?

1) Fossile fuel is limited in INDIA and world.,
2) Nuclear fuel is also limited in INDIA AS WELL AS in world but can give enrgy for some years.

[B]. - Con of Nuclear?

Cost of coal based power is Rs 1.50 / KWHcompared to Rs 3.00 /KWH for nuclear.

Like petroleum, Foreign currancy will goout for
1). TECHNOLOGY,
2). FUEL,
3). INSPECTION,
4). EQUIPMENT, ETC
5) dependent on other
6) Possible stopage of fuel on later date (like USA stopped for TARAPUR UNITS, canadian STOPPED FOR RAWTBHATA UNITS)


[C]. - Options for INDIA ?

OPTIONS with little or no foreign currancy OUTGO:

1) WIND mill with limitless energy
2) HYDRAL with limitless life span,
3) SOLAR with limitless life,
4) Municipal waste with limitless life,
5) Agriculture waste WITH LIMITLESS LIFE
6) COAL
7) GAS

OPTION WITH FOREIGN CURRANCY OUTGO:
1) NUCLEAR
2) PETROLEUM

[D] Why 50 - 60 years?

Now INDIA MAY SURVIVE with coal and gas, but after 60 years WIND, SOLAR, HYDRAL, WASTE cannot give sufficient energy for the INDUSTRY.

[E].- What is the option ?

INDIA SHALL USE NUCLEAR OPTION FOR ENERGY GENERATION

[F] What is about foreign currency, dependence?

1). SINCE 50 - 60 YEARS is long. INDIA SHALL EXPLORE IT'S 1800 KM by 2000 km land surface, 100 - 2000 km on sea bed to check if urenium can be extracted economically.
2) USA has formed NSG with 50 countries to deny access to nuclear fuel to countries like NDIA. World has 120 - 150 countries. INDIA can make an extensive search for URANIUM in the remaining POOR countries. It will help that POOR country for their economic unliftment and HELP india to gel fuel. But how does it stop the foreigncurrency outgo? Since these poor contries need is limited to " ROOTI-KAPDE-AUR-MOKAN", in which INDIA is strong enough; it can exchagne those goods with NUCLEAR FUEL ( if available). Since these poor countries does not have economical, technological capability, they will welcome help from INDIA.

[G]. Why this deal ?

If INDIA refused to this proposal, OPTION as in [F] above can not be materialised? Why? Since USA is WORLD DADA, it will influence other ( 125-50 = 75) countries not to allow INDIA for exercising OPTION [F]


[H].- Conclusion ?

INDIAN has no option but to sign the deal.

Answer 10

the big answer is, if one country starts , then more start