English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-25 11:41:21 · 32 answers · asked by Page 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

It must have been a hard task. I am just back from a trip to the region and I really didn't see any polar bears!!
I really have a problem with this one.

Can anyone propose a decent argument. Thanks

2007-10-25 11:44:00 · update #1

Mesopotamia! Oops ...sorry got confused! Palestine is always on my mind! Are you sure? Well, they are both troubled places!

2007-10-25 11:45:16 · update #2

It is all very interesting! lol

2007-10-25 11:47:31 · update #3

32 answers

Nevermind that they wouldn't have survived the trip to the region. "Anything is possible with God" is always an easy out for the intellectually dishonest.

2007-10-25 11:51:47 · answer #1 · answered by Shawn B 7 · 3 1

Penguins and polar bears could simply raft on sea ice, duh...Thus they had no use for god or an ark (do notice, they are rapidly heading towards extinction, now. Coincidence - I think not!)

Please recall, Noah didn't take any Cetaceans nor Marine/aquatic fish, either, other than his precious pet, "Goldie the goldfish", who was later found upside down in her tiny little bowl. Noah was devastated, but they had a maritime funeral and the rest of the estranged animal kingdom bleated a solemn tune as her fragile, lithe body slipped into the sea. (Goldie was quickly devoured by a very hungry leopard shark who had being eying the entire ark situation with both suspicion and anticipation)

2007-10-26 02:06:07 · answer #2 · answered by outcrop 5 · 0 0

The Bible states that the animals came to Noah; he did not have to round them up (Genesis 6:20). God apparently caused the animals to come to Noah. The Bible does not state how this was done.

We also do not know what the geography of the world was like before the flood. If there was only one continent at that time, then questions of getting animals from remote regions to the ark are not relevant.

2007-10-25 11:55:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

There was no polar region before the flood. The polar bear is a micro-evolutionized version of a bear that was on the ark.

there is no macro-evolution.

2007-10-25 12:07:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Here are some links that might answer your questions. Many more questions too.

The animals did come to Noah. And it was two of each kind of animal.

2007-10-25 14:26:51 · answer #5 · answered by Lofty M 3 · 1 0

The penguins swam and the polar bears walked, but you must remember this was before global warmings, the internets and nuklar threats. so they were much closer then now.

2007-10-25 12:27:13 · answer #6 · answered by JF 3 · 1 0

It was before Global Warming hit the Middle East thus their were animals of all kind there.

2007-10-26 05:01:44 · answer #7 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 0 0

Good Question Rove... I say that they were in a region that was unaffected, (floating ice caps)

2007-10-26 02:42:23 · answer #8 · answered by Antiliber 6 · 0 0

God, the one who commanded him to do so, commanded the animals (who were obedient to him and didn't lie on him by saying he doesn't exist or that he has a son or thaqt he is Jesus) to go to Noah so that he may do what he was commanded to do. God is the greatest!!!

2007-10-25 11:54:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I wouldn't know for sure, but I'd assume that since it was God who commanded Noah to build the ark that he also 'brought' Noah all the animals that he needed.

2007-10-25 11:46:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

fedest.com, questions and answers