good?
http://thethornonarose.livejournal.com/
I saw it and i really liked it.Tell me what you think.
2007-10-25 11:31:28 · 5 answers · asked by It hurts 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
First of all, you hit on a fundamental point of not only photography, but all art: "beauty is in the eyes of the beholder." What's one person's junk is another person's treasure. It shouldn't matter what others think of the art as you are the one appreciating it.
For me, it's a cliché and doesn't have much visual impact. But that is worth no more than what you or anyone else feels.
2007-10-25 11:37:57 · answer #1 · answered by Lou 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As others pointed out art is subjective, but the reason why certain works of art make it into museums whilst other don't is the result of somewhat more objective reasons. However, if you like this work, then enjoy it, but in all honesty it is seriously cliche, and bland in character.
2007-10-26 00:23:45 · answer #2 · answered by wackywallwalker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
photography is anything you want it to be. like the person said above "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." this is because everyone has different interpretations of what they see and because everyone has a different definition of beauty.
i personally like her photographs, you can tell she photographs nature, & so do i to that matter. i specially love the butterfly one at the top.
though my art teacher says not to edit my photographs a lot since our first & main goal should be to demonstrate OUR artistic talent, not the talent of editing programs.
2007-10-25 19:08:58 · answer #3 · answered by stargirl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If it pleases them it is good. It does nothing for me. Snapshots mean something to the one that took them. These don't appeal to me aesthetically whatsoever.
2007-10-25 20:26:42 · answer #4 · answered by Bob 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you like it, then it's good for you. I did not care for it, looks like snapshots to me. Art is subjective,
2007-10-25 23:20:27 · answer #5 · answered by Ara57 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋