2007-10-25 07:05:09 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Medicine
mad cow disease
2007-10-25 07:07:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess the thought in this question is becoming a top scientist while studying about mad cow disease which exposes the scientist himself on the risk of getting infected.
If I have some prospective solution to save the world from mad cow's disease, I won't mind having mad cow's disease (regardless of becoming a top scientist or not) . If just for an intention of becoming a top scientist for personal glory without any prospective positive result,I would rather find any other subject that I can possibly yield better contributions.
2007-10-25 15:40:49 · answer #2 · answered by ♥ lani s 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all you spelled scientist wrong and secondly people can not get mad cow disease - hence the name "mad cow". People get Creutzfeldt - Jakob disease and not some bovine disease as you have stated.
2007-10-25 16:55:58 · answer #3 · answered by mjb 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What kind of question is this? Easy...top scientist
2007-10-25 14:07:05 · answer #4 · answered by ameeker 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I... I think I'd reather be a really good scentists... Is this ambiguous or something?
2007-10-25 14:08:18 · answer #5 · answered by The Big B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ive already been the first one.....how bout sumthin nu.....mad cow disease it is..........
2007-10-25 14:08:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
id rather be chuck norris
2007-10-25 14:07:50 · answer #7 · answered by diamonddude1234 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither one
2007-10-25 14:08:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
PROFESSOR X!!!!!!
2007-10-25 14:07:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
scientist... duh!!! why would anyone WANT mad cow disease??
2007-10-25 14:07:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋