Belivers : Give me proof God exist
Atheist : Proove he he doesnt exist
ATHEIST: I dont want any website and your evolution theory
YES , thats a condition only for Atheist
2007-10-25 03:08:21 · 20 answers · asked by Acid 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You could make a good comedy based on that sort of scnario, but as a question it is too confused to be meaningful
2007-10-25 04:34:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bible has much proof that its deity cannot exist. He is said to have created the universe and to be omniscient. If that was true, why would he know much less about this universe than many ancient peoples did? Pi is given as 3.00 in two Bible passages, while many peoples knew it is 3.14. From Genesis to Revelation, the authors believe in a 'firmament', i.e. that the sky is a solid dome that will roll up like a scroll and shake loose stars that are small lights on it. Aristarchus of Greece correctly measured the distance to the Moon as 240,000 miles. He could teach astronomy to the God of the Bible. There are glaring contradictions, e.g. one verse says God inspired David's census, while a later one says the Devil did it. Jesus was born in the reign of Herod in one passage but during Quirinius' census in another passage. Herod died in 4 BC, and Quirinius began ruling Judaea in 6 or 7 AD. Joseph was 28th or 41st in descent from David in different passages, but Jesus was not descended from David if Joseph was not his father and cannot be the true Messiah. There are many such errors in the Bible that show someone quite ignorant wrote them. It is much better to say ignornat men who claim to speak for a god they invented wrote the Bible.
2007-10-25 10:31:21 · answer #2 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You do not prove that something doesn't exist or that something is not true. This is a rule of logic and not related to religion. If a person make a claim like "Santa is real" then that person must present evidence to support their claims.
Essentially atheist, at least some of us, treat God like any other theory, evidence and supporting analysis must be presented and validated, before it can be accepted.
2007-10-25 10:19:59 · answer #3 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
my religion is not based on 'belief' but experience.
spirutual matters are part of subjective experience; they are not provable, and should not be mistaken for the objective world, or imposed to explain the objective world - one measures furnture with rulers and tape measures, not metaphors. Likewise, one's favorite foods are based on tastes (a different variety of the subjective, but still subjective).
as a subjective, there is no way for spiritual experiences to be qualified or quantified, nor should we expect them to be. Likewise, there is no way to expect that everyone has the same spiritual experiences, nor should we expect them to be.
If two people eat the exact same dish with the exact same ingredients, they can (and should) have individual experiences that do not rely on the other's.
If any god/goddess/gods exist, unless they chose to make their presense known to all in an objectively measurable way, then they exist (whether by their choice or by human perception) only in the subjective, and thus not only cannot be proven (other than as described concepts), nor should they be.
2007-10-25 10:23:22 · answer #4 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
something that doesn't exist can not be proven
the only thing the Christians have of proof is the bible, this is just a 1800yrs old book of allegorical interpretation, which can be proven as false many times over by the Atheist, but the believer wont listen because they have faith, faith is blind, therefore they cannot see the truth.
2007-10-25 10:20:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If there is a god, he answers some prayers, particularly requests for healing. To date the only persons healed, have had no medical explanation for the healing. However, because the healings were all internal there is no proof that a god did it. However, no amputee has ever been healed. If there is a god why has no verifiable healing ever occured?
2007-10-25 10:26:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is just as much evidence for Leprechauns as there is for God. Do you believe in Leprechauns?
Thou shalt worship leprechauns.
Thou shalt teach your children and non believers children that Leprechauns stimulated the evolution process and therefore created the earth in their wisdom.
Thou shalt give tax dollars to Leprechaun worship centers who claim to give money to the poor.
Thou shalt immediately stop the medical procedure of organ transplants because it is morally abhorrent to Leprechauns and their followers.
etc......
Long answer short, the burden of proof is on the shoulder of the believer who wants to use law and government to dictate the lives of the non believer.
2007-10-25 10:12:54 · answer #7 · answered by ɹɐǝɟsuɐs Blessed Cheese Maker 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Im a believer, and my proof is in the bible, and why do I believe the bible?? because I have faith. I dont need physical proof that God exist, I just have faith, and thats all I need.
2007-10-25 10:12:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
To prove something (one o not two by the way) is to demonstrate the truth or existence of something by evidence or argument .
So therefore it is impossible to prove something doesn't exist.
2007-10-25 10:15:12 · answer #9 · answered by Birdy is my real name 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Can't prove a negative.
Burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Unless you want to prove to me that the invisible, intangible dragon under my bed doesn't exist?
2007-10-25 10:11:25 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 11⤊ 1⤋