Drew, I really like the new avatar. It's groovy, baby.
2007-10-25 01:22:00
·
answer #1
·
answered by frenzy-CIB- Jim's with Jesus 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Nothing????
I suppose the 80% of kindergarten kids were from Christian schools where as the 17% of uni students were of mixed religions and/or aren't having Christianity shoved down their necks like the kids are.
Yeh Nothing IS better than god.. ie.. It's much better having nothing than having a god.
2007-10-24 17:53:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Stupot 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
NOTHING is greater than god
NOTHING is more evil than the devil
the poor have NOTHING
the rich need NOTHING
if you eat NOTHING you will die
so its NOTHING.
2007-10-24 17:41:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Guilty innocence 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
I haven't read any of the other answers and I'm fairly confident that I'm with the Kindergarteners! The answer is: Nothing.
2007-10-25 07:09:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Michael B - Prop. 8 Repealed! 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
NOTHING is greater than god
NOTHING is more evil than the devil
the poor have NOTHING
the rich need NOTHING
if you eat NOTHING you will die
=]
2007-10-24 17:31:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by <3 3
·
7⤊
2⤋
nothing is greater than God
nothing is more vil than th devil
th poor hav nothing
th rich ndd nothing
and if you at nothin you will die
2007-10-24 17:50:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by NoNameForYou 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nothing. Lol that took a lot of thinking!
2007-10-24 18:53:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by BlckPdf 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nothing.
2007-10-24 21:21:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by thiru 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nothing!
2007-10-24 17:40:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lizzie 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
nothing
NoThInG can be greater than god
NoThInG can be more evil than the devil
The poor have NoThInG
The rich need NoThInG
If you eat NoThInG you will die
NoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInG NoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInG NoThInG
NoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInG
NoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInG
NoThInGNoThInG
NoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInG
NoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInGNoThInG
2007-10-24 19:32:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋