Was the Korean War right or wrong?

Question

Was the US right or wrong to take part in this war?

Answer 1

YESSS!!!!!!

MacArthur and Chesty made short work of the north.

Answer 2

The United States was absolutely right in taking part in the Korean War, because South Korea was invaded by North Korea and we had to defend South Korea against communist forces!!

Answer 3

Right. The North Koreans saw an opportunity to communise the whole penninsular and invaded. They had no right to do that. USA believes in the Domino Theory and approached the UN for a task force.

Answer 4

North Korea invaded South Korea.

UN debated what to do. USSR got pissed off and walked out.

Vote came up to send troops. USSR not there to veto the vote so the vote carried. Troops got sent under the UN banner.

USSR learned its lesson and has never walked out of a UN vote since that time.

Later in the war when we had pushed North Korea all the way back to its Northern border with Communist China and almost had them beat, some dumb *** Army Captains invaded China, allowing China to send in "volunteers" because the USA attacked China.

And all the USA could do was admit it.

Goes to show you the problems that can happen when subordinates DO NOT OBEY THEIR ORDERS!!!!

Answer 5

The Korean conflict was a UN Peace Enforcement Mission ordered by the UN Security Council under Chapter Seven of the UN Charter. It was the first ever of these peace enforcement missions. The U.S. Congress had passed the UN Support Act in 1946. So, we were already committed, as a national policy, to get involved in such an endeavor.
The problem was the lack of understanding by the ranking military commander of the UN Peace Enforcement Mission. He didn't understand that this was not the type of war he had previously fought in. The mission's objective was to restore the state of things which existed before North Korean forces invaded South Korea. Nothing more. Nothing less. Six days after the amphibious landings at Inchon, that objective had been achieved. But, General MacArthur continued pursuing those North Korean forces up to the banks of the Yalu River and wound up bringing China into the conflict and prolonging hostilies.
General Schwarzkopf, in his command of the UN Peace Enforcement Mission in 1991, understood the purpose of such a mission and its objective. Once Iraqi forces had been expelled from Kuwait and the state of things which existed before that invasion had been restored, the entire military action was halted.
Lesson learned? You have to read your orders.

Answer 6

First of all war is not right, then whether the Korean war was right or wrong I am not sure but I can and will be able to show you good and wrong things within the war . Right and wrong exist on a conventional level, even if they don't exist at the "ultimate" level Right and wrong are dependently co-arisen phenomena like everything else. They have no intimacy, but they still present us with practical problems also. US and USSR decision to split the Korean peninsula at the 38 parallel after the 2nd world war was wrong. They should have divided the country at war with them “Japan” not a victim of war Korea. In Europe they had divided German. The Americans felt that the soviet had done nothing much in the pacific so they used the criteria in Europe in the pacific where it was not relevant. The Americans and the Soviets should have just liberated Korea.

Kim II Sung's attack on South Korea, after which the cold war turned hot for Americans was wrong taking into consideration the agreement between the US and Soviet Union after the 2nd world war . If the USSR had earlier agreed to a plan with the US on dividing the Korea why they decided to extend the borders still come as a question. So the six million American intervention forces were right.

There was a failure to make plain ahead of time that such aggression would indeed be resisted. There was also a mistaken assumption, when the aggression came, that it must be the product of Stalin's own master plan for worldwide Communist conquest.
There came a mistaken intensification of the belief that all Communist actions everywhere were part of a single, implacably aggressive, worldwide war against freedom itself. Of which it was the case here the Koreans wanted to unite.

That it was right to decide to fight, but wrong not to share that decision with a ready and willing US Congress; that it was right to fire Gen. Douglas MacArthur, but wrong not to control him or fire him sooner; that it was right to go somewhat beyond the 38th Parallel, but wrong to approach the Yalu River in the face of Chinese warnings; that it was right not to use the bomb, but wrong not to be steadily clear about that choice. It was wrong for UN to put it's policies on a General . It was right for the Chinese to fight back and restore the 38 parallel which the UN had failed to implement . It was wrong for US and USSR for allowing Korea to be divided in the first place, or for failing to impose its unification later.

South Koreans and Americans have remained friends which is wrong. North Korea and Russia have remained friends which is wrong. As the warning of the cold war brings near the prospect of constructive change in North Korea, that friendship can have great impact on the prospect for peace and freedom in a newly united Korea.

The great mistake we make is to create and impose upon the cosmos value systems that brook no change that filter everything into absolute categories like right and wrong, good and evil, light and dark. This is the primary fault of the Americans and the Soviets mistakes before and after that decision, but I share the prevailing neutral judgment, both at the time and in later years, that the decision for the Korean War Was Wrong.

Answer 7

The Korean war was just, and it EVEN received support from the United nations!!!
US were right to participate because they were defending their ally, and their interests in that part of the world.

Answer 8

Ask the south Koreans

Answer 9

although the US took a leading part in this war so did many other countries including the UK and it was a united nations action that took them there, as to the right and wrongs look closely at the north and south of that nation then form a judgement.

Answer 10

The older Koreans will tell you with a resounding YES. Or at least those who remember the war. I know spent two tours in Korea, one before Marshal law was lifted and one after.

Answer 11

Walter B and that i disagree on the Korean elections after WW II. the U. S. and South Korea were all in favour of them, they could have gained. It change into the Soviets who refused to allow them. instead they appointed a clean Communist authorities, then claimed it change into the valid authorities of all of South Korea. contained in the recommend time elections were held in South Korea and Syngman Rhee change into elected president. the U. S. withdrew from South Korea leaving a small armed stress armed with rifles, gadget-guns, and mortars to ensure they would not attempt to invade the North. even as the Soviet Union withdrew from North Korea it left a huge military equipped with T-34/80 5 tanks and heavy artillery and inspired their client state to invade South Korea. in large area an similar critics who declare the Vietnam conflict change into incorrect will also declare the U. S. change into incorrect to help South Korea too. in truth, they many times attempt to declare the completed chilly conflict change into u.s.'s fault, and if we had in simple terms withdrawn all of our troops from Europe, lengthy gone homestead, and stuck our collective heads again up our behinds, like they were in the previous we were sucked into first WW I than WW II, the international can be a more suitable suitable and happier position than it truly is at present. They discuss that WW III don't have befell, because it did not ensue. it truly is like they do no longer understand of the idea of reason and outcome. there change into no international conflict III because, unlike in the previous WW I and WW II, u.s. change into paying interest with a proactive overseas coverage (of containment) and slammed a lid on Soviet aggression in the previous it ought to get out of hand for 40 5 years (which include in Korea and Southeast Asia). at present's stylish left-wing liberals do no longer go with to trust this, although the international survived the second one 0.5 of the 20 th-century because the U. S. stood up and did the right element in places like Korea and Vietnam in the course of the chilly conflict. the fast answer for your question is that both wars were well worth battling, and probable kept the international out of a nuclear replace someplace alongside the line.