Oh oh!!!
Now you looking for trouble.
2007-10-24 02:53:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, there is nothing reasonable about your claim. It's like asking if Batman is the father of all bats because someone put the word "bat" in his name when they imagined that fictitious person.
Also, your additional comment "God is Eternal ! so something which is eternal doesnt need a start!" is circular logic.
Read up on Occam's Razor. The Universe doesn't require any supernatural explanations for any aspect of its existence. Your assumption of an "originator of evolution" unnecessarily adds complexity and therefore is not the most parsimonious hypothesis.
2007-10-24 05:42:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by gebobs 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is often seen that Darwinism and Religion clash; what is clashing is ignorance and not the diciplines.
Darwinism is in regards to the body.
Religions are in regards to the Spirit.
The two are separate and become one upon incarnation.
For one to claim the others role is to mix oil and water. This mixing is the Ego-self placing itself in charge as it usualy does.
Al Bari is no doubt a direct term in regards to how Muslims may view God, a constant evolution of spirit, always growing, always learning.
2007-10-24 03:56:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Adonai 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
So because someone has given him the title "the evolver" that MUST mean he causes evolution...
Oh dear
It's....sheer stupidity to observe science, call a deity a name attributing said observations to the deity, and then say "look, the deity has that name, he must be the cause of the scientific observations".
For instance, I could start calling Leviathan "the gravity maker", or Eleventy "the sun riser". By the same logic as your argument I can now say "Of course Leviathan is responsible for gravity, why else would he be called 'the gravity maker'? And of course Eleventy makes the sun rise every morning, otherwise he wouldn't have the name 'the sun riser'."
2007-10-24 03:04:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tom :: Athier than Thou 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
perhaps, but there is not any evidence of it.
thus, whatever god or gods (if any) created evolution, he/she/it/they did not want us to know for sure it was them.
if one or more gods did not create evolution, how did life begin? We don't know yet. Science does not claim to have all the answers; there is no evidence that I am aware of offering a foundation for even an educated guess. It is okay to admit that we do not have all the answers, but lack of answers does not automatically make one religion or another's correct by default.
2007-10-24 02:54:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think of that God and evoluton are the two nicely suited. God works on a diverse timeline than people. The six days and nights the place God created the heaven and earth could have been thousands and thousands of years to us and a rely of days in Gods timeline.The seventh day while he rested could have been the thousands and thousands of years the place the life varieties in the international have been "evolving" and while our life varieties quite progressed sufficient to be self concious, he have been given returned to artwork. i'm uncertain while the international became into created yet i'm specific its been around plenty longer than 4004bc. there became into in all probability approximately 7 million people in the international in 4004 bc. additionally there is data of human life for hundreds of years till now then and the dinosaurs have been long long previous by utilising 4004bc yet they did stay in the international. How could desire to absolutely everyone have confidence that God could desire to create the universe devoid of having an awareness of technological information. The universe is in basic terms too complicated for who ever or despite made it to not have an company awareness of technological information. "The universe works on a math equation that in the time of no way even ever quite ends in the tip"
2016-10-07 12:35:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
am i getting this straight? you are using circular logic to state your opinion: "Also: If God didnt started evolution , then how did it began by itself?"
take a course on writing and then ask us the question
2007-10-24 02:54:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Abiogenesis is closer to chemistry than biology, but there are many scientific theories about the beginning of life, none of them require God's help.
Of course, it's possible that there is a supernatural being responsible, but it's just an unnecessary layer of complexity.
2007-10-24 02:52:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eleventy 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well the vast majority of muslims are creationists so... what the hell are you talking about?
What do you mean if god didn't start evolution? It sounds like you don't understand what evolution actually IS. It has nothing to say about the origins of life.
http://www.talkorigins.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/
http://www.livescience.com/evolution/
Maybe you want to go read about abiogenesis.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/
2007-10-24 02:51:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Leviathan 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
If one can believe that God is everlasting and has always existed, then why can't Atheists say the same thing about the universe?
2007-10-24 02:51:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ian 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
How?
Now that would be asking. Perhaps you should ask first how we would know one way or another?
The limited evidence we have strongly suggests that a lot of simple organic molecules, a lot of energy and a lot of time can quite easily result in self-replicating proteins... and from there, evolution takes over.
2007-10-24 02:53:15
·
answer #11
·
answered by Lucid Interrogator 5
·
3⤊
1⤋