English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am not against a woman being president. I am against hillary being president. She is a nasty ugly woman on the inside. NASTY!

Please find another to try to get in office.

I approve of this message.

2007-10-24 00:52:31 · 11 answers · asked by what? 3 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

11 answers

I'm with you. She'll do nothing for our country, except run it deeper into the ground.

Besides, no woman I know would ever still be married to someone who did what her slimeball husband did. That in itself speaks volumes about her character, or lack thereof.

2007-10-24 01:04:44 · answer #1 · answered by N L 6 · 1 2

Institute socialism? What a joke! More redneck right wing scare mongering. Your last resort! Can't you see that she is cosying up to George Bush and vice-versa? Don't worry pal. She will milk the middle classes and give everything to the rich and the corporations just as much as your hero George. Just you watch. The poor will get poorer, the middle class will continue to have their jobs outsourced to India, and the top 1% will get wealthier and wealthier. You will still have your endless wars, and your country will continue its downward decline, just as it has since 2000. Relax! The same plutocrats are in control, and will continue to bend you over and ream you just as they have been doing for the last 7 years - no matter who wins. The destruction of your country will continue unabated. The ignorant masses have seen to that. You just don't realise it yet, and probably never will. Don't worry. Be happy. The bad guys have won. Game over. The only kind of socialism you will ever see in America is corporate socialism. And it is draining your country's life blood like a vampire.

2007-10-24 01:08:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I can't figure it out either. She flip flops so often that I can't keep up with her views/plans. My latest favorite is how she plans to give up some of the executive powers....?!? Yeah, I almost believed that one. For those who say they would never vote Republican - PLEASE google ron paul. He is running on the republican ticket, but he doesn't sound like the scary corporate America Party (wait, wasn't shewhomustnotbenamed on the board of Walmart ?). He wants to downsize our federal government and his voting record after 10 terms in congress is consistent. Don't just shut him out for being GOP - the main stream media is blacking him out because the other candidates are running scared. I would love to hear an honest answer as to why someone really LIKES herself.

2007-10-24 17:55:11 · answer #3 · answered by sas 3 · 0 0

To give an answer we have to know which of these 4 very different Socialisms do you mean:

To avoid misunderstandings we use the term 'Socialism' no longer alone, but always together with an adjective. - As superordinate terms we use 'Democratic Socialisms' and 'Non-democratic Socialisms' (in the plural). 'Democratic Socialisms' = 'Social-democratic Socialisms' and 'Ecological (or Environmental or Green) Socialisms'. - 'Non-democratic Socialisms' = 'Communistic Socialisms' and 'Anarchistic Socialisms'.

2007-10-25 22:08:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think she'd do that, but I wouldn't vote for Hillary if she were the last candidate on earth. However, that is just me. I have the freedom to vote for anyone or not vote at all. However, I am probably voting Fred Thompson.

2007-10-24 00:56:31 · answer #5 · answered by BudgieTweet 3 · 2 2

You approve of the message? Good for you. Too bad it doesn't say anything of substance.

2007-10-24 01:02:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I will not vote for Mrs. Clinton, precisely because she is a socialist.
The ABC's of democrat voting, in 2008, should be:
Anybody
But
Clinton.

2007-10-24 00:55:59 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 2 3

I didn't like her the first time she was president.

2007-10-24 00:55:12 · answer #8 · answered by deniver2003 4 · 1 2

I would rather have her than any of the republican candidates. She can't do any worse than GW. Besides, then we would get to hear about Bill's indiscretions again, they are more fun than hearing about the deaths of soldiers.

2007-10-24 00:56:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

How can she do any harm? the country is so messed up now.

2007-10-24 00:58:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers