2007-10-23 18:35:37 · 7 answers · asked by Happy Summer 6 in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Los Angeles
First of all acp above should change her name to acp5150. A power pole falling down in Malibu, a jack*ss starting 3 fires in Irvine and a lunatic in Lake Arrowhead starting the mountain on fire is a far cry from Global Warming. The winds have shifted from blowing to the southwest to blowing north and will soon blow onto the shore (coastal eddy). The soot has exited inland and the shores exc for Newport Beach are Malibu have been spared..
2007-10-23 22:30:26 · answer #1 · answered by Your O.C. Paisano 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Venice is fine. I work for a delivery company and we deliver to venice all the time. As long as the fire stays up north...and no new fires break up...nothing to worry about there.
2007-10-24 02:35:47 · answer #2 · answered by KittieKatten 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not as of yet. Venice is located close to Santa Monica, Hollywood, Beverly Hills, etc. Currently, they are safe from the fires.
2007-10-24 01:38:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
seeing how Venice isn't around that many hills I'd say no, but you can never know for sure until the fires are 100% contained.
*god bless*
2007-10-24 01:38:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
sort of. the california fire contributes to global warming, if you know what that is. i'm not trying to say that you're dumb or anything, it just depends on how old you are and if you have learned about that. anyways global warming affects the entire earth so i would say the california fire effected Venice.
BTW, i don't know if this is some homework assignment because if it is then you can use that. if you're just curious i don't kn ow what to tell you
2007-10-24 01:39:17 · answer #5 · answered by acp91 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Neither is Santa Monica.
2007-10-24 01:37:50 · answer #6 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope
2007-10-24 11:01:01 · answer #7 · answered by copestir 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋