Only if the minimum age for service in the military is raised to 21. If you are old enough to serve our country, you are old enough to vote.
2007-10-23 13:35:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Wether it should be increased or decreased = I dont know.
But 1 thing It must be fixed in any age or age-free
So to say they can go for voting when they feel completely confident that they must do something abut the Biggest democracy being the very citizens that the have the powers, and feel responsible and guilty when they do'nt and feel an overburdened conscience of guilt if they ever failed.As if they have lost some birth right to piss...Sorry.
When will they be mature enough to realise that?
I do'nt know Soo Age free, Age= no bars.And thats that my friend.see ya.
2007-10-23 17:37:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Sico 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think so. At 18 a person can identify good and bad. Even though the age is 18 our voting % is not increasing.
2007-10-24 20:21:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Smart 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Makes no difference since in India the percentage of actual votes cast in most
constituencies is less than 50.So what does it matter whether the voting age remains the same or is raised.Further,so long as people
don't have the power of recall,even elections are meaningless as the politician who comes begging for votes doesn't even acknowledge the existence of the voter in his contituency
once the elections are over.
2007-10-27 13:13:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The voting age is already "unofficially" 22. Studies show that people18 to 21 don't even register to vote, much less actually go to the polls.
The government is run by those who choose to participate.
2007-10-23 16:01:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by another_guy_named_steve 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Randy weaver, was that you attempting to be clever, or did you have a seizure and hit those keys at random? And princessmeltdown: again, was that you trying to be clever? I mean it's pretty funny that, while trying to call someone stupid, you make yourself look stupid. No one lets anything breed, that's not the definition of the word, honey. You breed animals, they don't breed themselves. I understand you trying to sound more intelligent and harsh by using the word breed, but really- learn it's definition first, or at least it's implications. "breed" means to make procreate. So you can't let someone make someone do something. See how that is? Nice try, though. All of you here need to stop being hypocrites. You're so aggravated for him being hateful, that you hate back. Don't hate hate, its a vicious cycle. This question is ridiculous- on so many levels. One, you didn't state any support for you reasoning. I mean how can we agree or disagree with you when we don't know what you think? And secondly, theres no need for this hate, whether or not you disagree with republicans.
2016-05-25 07:04:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by jerry 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe we should just stop itself. Such useless, uneducated, jokers are ruling a country. Not a single city can boast of it's leaders.
So wats the point is increasing or decreasing age limit for voting??? Anyway one JOKER will win..... whether u want him there or not.
2007-10-26 20:17:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by DU 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because 18 yrs old can join army possible be drafted they should have say. What would be benefit.
I think youth to vote democratic so unless ur a billionaire not payin taxes its in all our interest to get democrats voting as much as possible
2007-10-23 13:35:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
And decreased to 70.
2007-10-23 13:43:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Is se desh me aman rahega.
2007-10-24 20:18:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋