None. Man is just too insignificant to make any impact on the climate.
2007-10-23 22:31:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr Jello 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If the energy comes from renewable sources like hydroelectric, geothermal, solar, wind, etc, then there would be little environmental impact.
This is the issue with Al Gore - at least as he says it. He offsets his energy use by investing in renewable sources like those mentioned above. Investments or not, you can't escape the fact he's using energy generated from burning coal and other less than clean sources.
2007-10-23 13:07:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Justin H 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The same as it is now. Al Gore is wrong.
2007-10-23 14:57:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by hawk_barry 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, let's all make Al Gore the scapegoat for our own refusal to REduce, REuse, or REcycle; for our own failure to try and save the Earth's environment; for our own ignorance as to the seriousness of global warming; and for our own gluttony, selfishness and arrogance that believes it's okay for us to continue driving around in gas-guzzling SUVs and Hummers; mine coal; explore for natural gas; over fish the oceans; destroy the rain forests so we can eat cheap BigMacs; drill for more oil in pristine wilderness; build luxury beachfront condos that ruin necessary mangrove forests; and ignore the plight of remote Eskimo tribes, polar bears, elephants, Asian lions, millions of species of insects, and thousands of other animals and plants that are necessary for the very survival of the human species!
It's all Al's fault - so let's blame it all on his hypocrisy instead of trying to do anything about it ourselves!! We'll just keep squandering all of Earth's natural resources because Al uses more energy than we do!! Blame it all on Al; kill the messenger instead of heeding the message!
2007-10-23 13:21:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
r u asking by what al gore says he uses, which would probly be nothing( cause he lies so much!)
or by what the media says ( and they r not always so truthful also)! in which case we would be out of energy in about 20 years, ajajajaj
take care
2007-10-23 13:06:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Edward Z 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Lets just say it would be quite balmy in the arctic right now.
2007-10-23 13:03:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
co2 raised as much as al gores what would it do? it would probably increase crop yeilds make plants more productive and healthier against disease and produce more oxygen that we breath. unless you can turn down the sun or change it's cycles our earth will warm no matter if we all just stopped driving or releasing co2 at all.
water vapor is more a green house gas then co2, co2 is considered a minor greenhouse gas. but you can't regulate or make money off water vapor.
There must be alot to gain by convincing people that humans cause global warming, otherwise why would they keep pushing so hard to get people to believe global warming is human caused and a disaster waiting to happen?
why would they keep pushing this fear down people's throat if there wasn't a huge, gigantic profit to be had from it? I am guessing they want to bring everyone's standard of living down, how many dictatorships countries are the people having a high standard of living and freedom to enjoy their life without being regulated to death do you know of?
the united nations is full of dictators. an organization is only as good as the people in it. if the people are bad, then the organization is bad, and the un is the one pushing this global warming thing, to get money directly without having to go through the united states and other industrialized nations governments. also it means they can regulate you to death, enslave you to the point that life becomes oppressive and a burden instead of a joy.
think about the implications, less fuel use, more cost to travel if they implement co2 taxes and road milage taxes, less food to eat, more hours to work, less recreation or vacations, more cost to travel to other places, less freedom to just move where ever you want (if they implement federalization into 10 parts regions they want to implement here in the usa) more debt as the cost of living rises and wages go down you will have to borrow just ot make ends meet without even considering luxuries, if you end up not being able to work or wish to just stop working because your just plain tired, then you can expect to go to a debtors prison, to make you work off the debt which never gets paid off because you keep having to be fed housed clothed and medical care and of course it will be more then what you are making at the prison, this all reminds me of loan sharking of the mafia.
of course it is not about the money at all but rather a way to keep you enslaved and working for them under the color of law, after all many super super wealthy people are raised with the idea they are gods or something and are so arrogant then can't stand the idea that you are free and enjoying your life doing the things you like and are not beholding to them or whatever and that you have soverign over yourself, and are not worshipping and working for them as their slaves. and as for many of the dictators in the un they can't stand americans for the same or similar reasons. because we are still freer than theh like, in fact bush was right the terrorists hate us because of our freedoms and of course the terrorists I refer to is exactly those who say this and perpetuate the terror threat to gain power.
and areas of the us you can't go to, such as public lands there are already parks that are off limits or you have to pay a fee, to go to a park we already paid for over and over with our taxes. there are park roads out west you can't go to anymore they have all the roads completely blocked and guarded, guarded? a park? what are they protecting animals?
these same parks are also called heritage sites, which are entrusted to the united nations. who in the world would give anything to a bunch of greedy dictators who have no interest in the citizens of the countries they have these sites at? these sites are found all over the world
ever hear of the crystal coast of north carolina? it is called that because the state fights back developers who want to drill and store oil and gas there, they limite development of industry like this, that is why the area is pristine, there were several cases of this happening in the past decade, they fought against a large navy port there and gas storage tanks on the small islands like shakleford.
these are barrier islands, mostly shifting and moving sands, a gas tanker there would be devastating in a hurricane. the crystal coast would be crystal no more.
so if the un gets control of all the oceans as bush is pushing to get lost passed (law of the sea treaty, treaties override national laws by the way.)
then they will dictate who can and cannot harvest resources of the sea and who can even swim in the sea you would have to get a permit to swin in the ocean or build a house on the beach, as there is a part in the LOST bill that gives the un some control over land use if that use affects the oceans directly or indirectly, which pretty much means anything they want it to mean. if they decide, out of the meaness of their hearts that your swimming in the oceans pollute it then you will be banned.
Co2 and global warming is the least of our problems. but it is one of the doors they are using to get the united nations to be the central government over the whole earth getting rid of nations soverignties. global warming is a cloak to that agenda.
RRRRR
2007-10-24 12:00:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They would probably fall by about 50*
Isn't he kind of slow? hahaha J/K
I have no idea!
2007-10-23 13:03:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by YikesOneMore 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow. By his "speaking" standards, we would all be dead. Isn't he just the meaning of oxymoron?
2007-10-23 13:17:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by 2 Happily Married Americans 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
We'de EXPLODE
2007-10-23 13:08:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋