Doesn't it seem oxymoronic to prove religion via science and math? one is hypothetical, while the other is concrete.
Doesn't it seem like it's reaching?!
It seems like it's another man-made excuse/attempt in the name of denial to try to convince the opposite side. If one truly believes, then everything else in this world wouldn't matter. Whereas, battling sides seems childish and insecure.
2007-10-23 10:04:44 · 3 answers · asked by the most oblivious wig-gur 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
isn't it circular reasoning to explain the world and god with science but with the foundation that god exists?! existence of god shouldn't be a statement. it should be a question. otherwise, it's bold and arrogant to say you know all.
2007-10-23 10:44:45 · update #1
"Christian science" isn't science at all. It does not follow the scientific method. It begins with with a conclusion, then proceeds to twisting the facts to fit them in their unstable views.
2007-10-23 10:09:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Besides no were in a science book anywhere does it say god doesn't exist. People just don't want to accept that, so its a battle with an ignorance perception of what science is. Science only has 3 laws, none of which have anything to do with god, ever heard of gravity? motion? heat? that's the ONLY things science can predict, not gods existence. Now why they would want to attack a theory which is nothing more then a fact that CAN'T be proven false YET, is beyond me. But it was the first thing that got me away from religion, ignorance like that...... science can co-exsist with religion, but religion can't co-exsist with science, hmmmm something wrong here......
2007-10-31 05:35:34 · answer #2 · answered by Brutal Honesty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
christianity and science go hand in hand,and if it were'nt for
God and his creations there would be no science.
the problem arises when people use science wrongly and
try and put their wisdom above God's wisdom or to say that
he doesnt exsist.
2007-10-23 10:15:09 · answer #3 · answered by SOMEONE 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋