christians: both god and jesus are referred to as men. and adam was created first and eve was just his rib. so

Question

so should i assume that, from a christian prespective, men are better than woman?.......
i know we we are physically and mentally, but im asking about morally?

im taking the piss people! haha i dont actually believe that..... duh.

this is fun tho

Answer 1

I'm not Christian, but your mysogynistic question caught my attention.

You're a pig. Men and women are equal.

Women are actually more intelligent than men and are better at decision-making and dealing with stress. But since you're a PIG and therefore not a real man at all, there's no question about your lack of intelligence. Do you show off your stupidity because you're a troll, or do you think you're entertaining people? Or are you just jealous because you've realized how truly inferior you, as a PIG, are to humanity in general?

You obviously have a problem with women. I suggest you get some professional help.

Answer 2

No. God is not a man OR a woman. If Jesus was a man, it was likely only because of the culture in which he was born. Men were more powerful in ancient Palestine, and it would not have made sense to come to earth in the form of a woman at that period, but ultimately the fact Christ was a man is arbitrary and unimportant. The Bible shows that men and women are often unequal in society, but there is no evidence whatsoever that men are "better" than women, even in the Bible. Look at Deborah, Ruth, Esther, or Christ's mother. That said, I completely and utterly disagree with your statement that "we" are mentally better than women. That is an outright fallacy in every way. In many cases, men are not even physically stronger. It depends on the man and woman in question. Mentally, however, women and men are fundamentally equal, both biologically and culturally.

So if you are looking for an excuse to support your male chauvinism, the Bible is not the place. You'll merely be illustrating your own ignorance when you cherry-pick the parts that support your weak hypothesis and ignore the parts that prove you wrong. And if you are looking for an excuse to show that Christians are male chauvinists, I think I just proved that there are many exceptions to that alleged idea, too.

Have a nice day!

Answer 3

I do not portray myself as Christian, or for that matter non-Christian. This answer is a bit-tongue-in-cheek, and no offense is meant by it.

My mother read a book entitled "The First Sex" when I was too young to grasp many of it's principles. I am a very curious being, so I asked her if she could put the context of the book in a nut-shell. She seemed very good humored that day and she offered this;
"Two X chromosomes are needed in order to have a female child. A male is created when one of the X's gets a bit of the code broken off to make it X and Y. Therefore Dear, all men are mutants."
I began to feel sorry for my father. lol

Answer 4

God felt the greatest gift to give man that would make them happy, was a woman. Physically, yes most men are stronger. Better? No. Mentally better? No. Morally? I think it is the same. That is my christian perspective and I'm a woman.

Answer 5

I believe that perspective is completely wrong. Jesus had no problem dealing with women exactly as He dealt with men.
Most men are physically stronger than women, but not mentally or morally. God meant for the husband and wife to become one. Therefore, God put different strengths in each.

Answer 6

No.

Jesus was a man because that is the only way it could be... (i.e., The Incarnation - God taking the form of a male, being born and taking His Flesh from a Woman) so that both sexes have equal access to the Eternal Godhead.

Answer 7

try a dose of reality.....

1. Many more individuals are born than can possibly survive, thus there is competition for limited resources

2. Within this vast number there is variation, and because of this variation some of these individuals will have an advantage--however slight--over others

3. The ones who have the advantages are more competitive and thus they are more likely to obtain the limited resources

4. The ones who are succeeding in securing the limited resources are more likely to reproduce and thus pass onto their offspring the more competitive traits

Darwin

Answer 8

God is referred to in the masculine, but never is referred to as a man. Let's be clear about that. But Eve was made from Adam's rib, not the dust of the ground, so if anything, she's a superior creation. There's the old saying about being taken from the rib so as not to be downtrodden by man, or to lord over man, but to walk by his side as equal, and I believe this is mostly correct. God does give authority to the male, but not to lord over women, but rather to be the more dominant gender of the species. Before anyone accuses me of being one, I am NOT a chauvinist. Some exceptional women do exist, I have known many, and admire them more than most men. At the Fall of Man, however, God said to the woman "your desire shall be for your husband but he will be over you." In other words, women will want to be the more dominant, but man will still be in authority over her. That's the punishment for Eve allowing herself to be deceived.

Answer 9

You far over-estimate your gender based abilities.

I have always suspected it's just envy that spurs on this desire to declare superiority over women. Regardless of how hard you punch, or how much you can lift, you will still never be able to grow a human being. That fact will always make you dependent and less capable. Being male you resent that kind of control over your fate, so you put women down.

Doesn't change anything, females are the gender chosen to be responsible for the continuation of the species. That fact speaks volumes, IMHO.

Answer 10

after I see a lengthy question like this, it in simple terms makes me drained. For a guy who pretends to no longer trust, you effective look to get excitement from examining the bible. I in simple terms had to state the glaring between Matthew, Luke and John. those are eyewitness debts. they do no longer experience completely. it should be no diverse once you search for advice from from 3 eyewitnesses to an vehicle twist of destiny. because all of them have a countless attitude, they could probable bear in mind and record slightly diverse observations. besides, this isn't an “mistakes.” If some thing, it illustrates the validity of the bible. If I said 3 autonomous witness debts to an vehicle twist of destiny that each and every one matched completely, i ought to ask your self if there have been any collusion between the witnesses.