many christians deny evolution but none seem to deny the existance of dna. on earth christ had the body of a complete human male. since he was a man he therefore must have had testicles that contained sperm that contained dna. also christ must have had dna in order for cell generation.
that would mean christ could reproduce with a woman if he had choosen to and the kids would have been 50% christ. what do christians think about this idea?
2007-10-23 06:36:55 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
also christians - i posted this question before and i got deleted. why? was it the words "christ" and "testicles" in the same sentence that got you flustered?
2007-10-23 06:45:42 · update #1
A more intersting question is -- if we could find his DNA and clone him -- would his clone be God?
2007-10-23 06:41:07 · answer #1 · answered by Ranto 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You are speaking of the miracle of the Incarnation. That Jesus Christ was both fully God and fully man.
In the Incarnation, the divine nature of the Son of God was perfectly united with human nature in one divine Person. This person, Jesus Christ, was both truly God and truly man. This doctrine is specifically referenced in the Bible in John 1:14 and Colossians 2:9. It is known as the hypostatic union.
How this was done remains a mystery. However no Christian would believe that Jesus' DNA would reveal the mystery. His DNA would be expected to be fully man. His divinity is not to be found in the DNA. It would be found in his soul.
2007-10-23 06:48:03 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he did have a family. But I also think he was just a man.
2007-10-23 06:44:45 · answer #3 · answered by Lorreign v.2 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with your premise.
However, Jesus was never married, and was without sin.
Accordingly, no offspring.
2007-10-23 06:43:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋