Why do questions get reported or removed when people speak the truth?

Question

I am a logical Muslim but I see questions deleted when

1) people ask question or answers about Ayesha who was married to prophet Mohammed at the age of 9.
2) When people say sperm comes from lower back according to the Quran .
The holyQuran Sura At Tariq ( Chapter 86 verse# 6-7) says
" He is created from a water gushing forth
Proceeding from between the back-bone and the ribs"

From modern science we know sperm comes from testicles not from lower back. When people say sperm emits Abdominal Aorta, which is in the area between the back bone (spinal column) and the ribs they sound lame. This means that they are saying that the prostate gland and seminal vesicles are in the abdomen. They are not. They are located within the pelvis not the abdomen.

3) When people quote from Sura Al Azhab in the Quran that muslims are allowed to have sex with servants
(Chapter 33 verse # 50)
"We have made lawful to you your wives, and those (captives or slaves) whom your right hand possess

Answer 1

People only want to beleive their version of the truth. No matter what anyone says no one likes change and people who are different scare them. I say believe what you want and worship what you want and live like you want (unless you r breaking the law where you live) We all have our own moral compass to guide us. Let people believe in what they want. It doesn't mean that you have to believe the same thing. Everyone need to just relax.

Answer 2

It was probably a Muslim who reported it, because most other people wouldn't pay any attention at all. But we all have problems with people who abuse the "report" function. That's why Yahoo has recently made a major change in the function, and made it clear that if people report when it is not justified, they will be suspended. Of course, they just create a new account and come back, but they lose all their points that way.

You do have the right to appeal a violation notice if you feel it is unjustified, but I don't know that you will get a prompt response. Or any at all, for that matter. I appealed one, but have not bothered to follow up, because it's only a few points. If I had someone "stalking" me, violating my answers over and over, I'd protest. Loudly.

Answer 3

Because some troll that disagrees with the view of the question or answer reports them, and the new yahoo way just deletes them after they are reported. It is just ridiculous.

Answer 4

Depends on how the questions are worded, if they seem to be anti-Islam, then Muslims are probably reporting them, if they're pro-Islam they may be reported for content. I'm guessing that they are reported more by Muslims.

Answer 5

People of religion have been suppressing the truth wherever it contradicts dogma for millennia. Here in Y!A R&S things are no different.

Answer 6

I'm supposing (properly or now not) ;) that you are speakme approximately me. Your query presupposes that exaggerating is reverse or a minimum of different, than talking the reality. This isn't the case -- a minimum of now not consistently. If I say that I stuck a fish t-h-i-s lengthy, whilst I simplest stuck a fish this lengthy, then sure, I'm mendacity via exaggeration. However if say of a the city, "It used to be a kind of cities that in case you blink, you'll be able to omit it," then I am now not mendacity via exaggerating. Every individual to whom I talk will appreciate that I imply to mention it is a small the city, now not that a millisecond blink will real motive one to overlook seeing all of it-in combination. Therefore it's not always a lie to magnify. It may be very by and large not more than a colourful and intriguing method of talking the reality. Did Jesus real imply we must hate our households? Pluck out an offending eye or reduce off an offending hand? That a camel must cross by way of the attention of a needle? (BTW, the "needle gate" tale isn't precise -- any one made it up to check out and provide an explanation for this comment of His -- and that IS mendacity, even though it is certainly a well tale.) There are most likely many, many matters Jesus mentioned that are supposed to be taken as immediately, unexaggerated truth. Love your enemies; Don't pay off evil for evil, however as an alternative forgive; out of the fullness of the center, the mouth speaks. Sometimes it could get ambiguous, however now not by and large. And we consistently have the autumn-again, fail-risk-free of understanding that if one motion is extra loving than an extra, it is certainly the extra loving of the movements that He's speakme approximately. And we do recognise which motion that's, due to the fact He lives in our hearts. We have the brain of Christ. We recognise that there are plenty of instances once we ourselves must now not be taken actually. Precision in language isn't an main target of Father's, for He certainly not mentions it that I can bear in mind. He prohibits bearing fake witness. That's as near as He comes. And bearing fake witness is under no circumstances synonymous with making use of hyperbole. So there's my take and there are my examples -- what I got here up with off the highest of my head (and no, I used to be now not dressed in them as a hat). Do you quite believe He desired us to pluck out an eyeball or 2? All Christendom could be blind via now if so, or as a minimum disobedient to a simple command of Christ. After all, He simply mentioned in case your eye reasons you to lust -- He did not specify the item of the lust needed to be sexual. The scriptures aren't a technical handbook. They're a made from the connection among God and individuals. They are encouraged via God and written via human palms. That's why you'll be able to inform whether or not you are studying Paul or Peter or John with out spotting the passages and with out the reference. They write another way from one an extra. Ezekiel writes another way from Daniel, who writes another way from Moses or David. You can inform if you already know them. That's the human detail. Jesus used to be and is human, too. Otherwise He would now not have stored us. He used the idioms of His day, the method of expression that labored in His challenge -- now not what could have labored in these days in a trendy western school. Being God doesn't suggest you must comply with the principles of clinical conversation authorised in trendy-day America. Just due to the fact that is the way in which we speak (by and large) doesn't suggest it is the simplest proper method. Love you, Sis Cindy

Answer 7

poor christians first you have a problem with athiests now you get invaded by muslims,,,leave these christians theyre ours or else start talking allah stuff so we can pull you apart too oh and another thing make your questions and answers shorter we havent got all night

Answer 8

haha sperm in the back

Answer 9

It hurts to know the truth.

Answer 10

some ppl are full of jealousy