2007-10-22 08:46:49 · 30 answers · asked by Bebe 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Science proves God is a human fantasy with the evidence.
2007-10-22 08:49:40 · answer #1 · answered by Steve C 7 · 3⤊ 7⤋
I think so. I am a firm Christian believer and I don't believe God needs to be proven with science and logic, although there are certainly ways we can and have done that. For instance, scientists have now discovered that it is biologically impossible for human eyes to have evolved from early primate's eyes. This is due to some chromosome beneath the surface which does not have the ability of adaptation. Also, scientists, who for so long said there was no God pointed to the Appendix saying it was a "left-over" part of our body that was once necessary in our "ancestors", but no longer had a point. Anyway, these same scinetists just recently came out with informaiton showing that the Appendix is necessary in order to create toxins, which then go to the stomach and prevent certain diseases. Funny how they keep running out of excuses for not believing. But like I said, we should believe because we listen to our hearts, not to scientists.
2007-10-22 08:58:27 · answer #2 · answered by Texas Longhorn 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's really just their point of view. Some people believe in God. It is a faith in a higher power. Some people believe that the only way a God can exist is because of science. Not everyone believes the same things. It may not be something you or I agree with, but everyone has their own ideas of what God is or who God is.
2007-10-22 09:00:02 · answer #3 · answered by Katie S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really sure how to answer that since I believe science is humans discovering how God did what he did.
I sometimes get the feeling that many Christians think God just waved his hands or sneezed and there it was. There is a great design here.
Even with all that is there believing in God (or for the matter NOT believing) takes a leap of faith.
No matter how much science you can use to form your proof, you're still going to have that leap.
For non believers, that leap of faith is abiogenesis (the formation of life from non-living matter) and the "matter from nothing."
2007-10-22 09:15:18 · answer #4 · answered by Hawk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not actually, see people try to prove that god is real with science because that is the only evidence and it seems pretty accurate in fact. There is no way to prove what the eyes cannot see, people will believe what they believe. This is up to peoples believe, if i was to tell people that there is evidence and facts to proof that over 5500 years ago everyone knew god's word but seprated into their own beliefs, would you believe me?
2007-10-22 08:55:20 · answer #5 · answered by I_know_it_ALL 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Maybe but even Carl Sagan (an agnostic I believe) knew science did not have all the answers. At the end of the day it is faith that is required...and that works just fine for me. I love science and I love that there is a body of natural laws in place (chemistry, physics, etc.) but I do believe those rules were put in place by the Creator of the Universe: God.
2007-10-22 08:55:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
No we are not missing the point. The ones who are trying to prove God does exist w/o science are..
2007-10-22 08:49:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes. God is "unprovable" using science.
It's the milk jug thing:
"If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision, then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident, and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too. If so, then all our present thoughts are mere accidents - the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms. And this holds for the thoughts of the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else's. But if their thoughts - i.e., Materialism and Astronomy - are mere accidental by-products, why should we believe them to be true? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give me a correct account of all the other accidents. It's like expecting the accidental shape taken by the splash when you upset a milk-jug should give you a correct account of how the jug was made and why it was upset."
C.S. Lewis
2007-10-22 08:49:47 · answer #8 · answered by lady_phoenix39 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
what's the point? God created nature and therefore the study of science. We cannot deny what we find in nature, then we might be saying that God didn't do something that God did in fact do.
2007-10-22 08:50:45 · answer #9 · answered by phil 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes,because every thing happens by the will of God,We don't need to prove it we only have to believe in it with full faith,.
2007-10-22 17:02:35 · answer #10 · answered by Tehseen B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, but it's only rational to try and prove God's exisitence because as humans we can't just accept things as facts we have to know everything. You can't blame people for trying, but by proving he exists then he no longer does because hes based on faith alone.
2007-10-22 08:51:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋