working citizens from other countries? I'd take 5 farmworkers from Mexico for a family of 5 that we can't move off the dole. Let Mexico deal with them.
2007-10-22 05:11:11 · 12 answers · asked by Yahoo Answer Angel 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
whiz, thanks for pointing out the obvious for me.
2007-10-22 07:07:38 · update #1
whiz...I wasn't being sarcastic, your response was appropriate, and I just didn't feel like pointing it out myself.
2007-10-22 09:18:01 · update #2
It would be fine with me. But it would only be LEGAL immigrants that we accepted, not the millions of illegal aliens we already have here. They have GOT TO GO!
To Beach Girl
Disabled Vets do not "refuse" to work, rather they CANNOT work.
EDIT: Sorry if I "pointed out the obvious". Some on here lump everybody together...whereas there is a distinct difference between legal immigrants and illegal aliens. Didn't mean to say you were one of them. I was more saying it for others' benefit. Some do it out of ignorance, others do it to try to intentionally do it to "legitimize" illegal aliens, to make it seem as if they are immigrants too, the same as legals.
2007-10-22 05:47:32 · answer #1 · answered by whiz 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I have a better idea. Let's create and enforce a new program
The Oil for Illegals Program.
Mexico is the world’s 4th richest oil producing nation; they have oil fields that rival the Middle East’s. If the American government refuses to deport those here illegally, and Mexico’s government refuses to stop encouraging people to go to the US illegally and send money home to prop up their economy...that’s fine.
BUT, in return, Mexico must remit 1 barrel of oil each month for every Illegal Immigrant in the US to offset the drain on our economy from the social services, lost taxes, health care, educational and other services they receive. Think about that, with an estimated 12-20 million illegals in the US...that’s a lot of oil.
It also helps solve another problem, with the influx of free crude oil from Mexico, we then DRASTICALLY reduce our dependence on Arab Oil and OPEC and we can tell them to go get stuffed, lower prices at the pump to put money back in the pockets of the taxpaying citizens who have been footing the bill for illegals for decades, and quit letting Mexico export their problems to us. They will have to start caring for their own citizens and economy.
2007-10-22 05:25:43 · answer #2 · answered by flaming_liberal415 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Why can't U.S. government legalize unlawful immigration via putting the time cut back, and supply them specific visa like different worldwide places do, including they might desire to flow lower back to homestead united states each 12 months, no prolonged term? (in any different case, they are going to be fined their entire 12 months earnings.)" by way of fact unlawful immigrants are not right here - they are interior the rustic without figuring out traits including call, case quantity, handle.. for that reason they are right here illegally and undocumented. "additionally, for those criminal immigrations, why can't the government lead them to to pay doubled taxes, including 50 to 60 p.c. of their entire earnings? (So, others can get reward, additionally, reduces distant places money floating out of this united states.)" while you evaluate that would desire to be un-American. Our ancestor's got here right here on a boat merely like many criminal immigrants do at present. we're not from now on interior of reach to this land than they are. What we've contributed over the years - they might make contributions over the subsequent 60 years. "And why can't government make companies who hire those human beings take care of their insurance? (No insurance, advance employer taxes.)" some companies disguise organic born electorate scientific insurance, merely as they might a distant places born citizen who's a U.S. criminal immigrant. i'm uncertain what you advise via this. "for the reason that no individuals want to artwork in specific container, those unlawful immigrants can fill the blanks." so which you're in help of permitting human beings to flow the border illegally and obtain a artwork status and a standing with our government? i'm very at a loss for words via your submit.
2016-11-09 04:51:43 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, for good or bad these are ours and we do not like Mexico think exporting our citizens is the moral thing to do
2007-10-22 06:37:32 · answer #4 · answered by jean 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That won't work. This is America. People have rights. Especially American citizens. The U.S. needs to stop trying to be cheap and put up a wall that can't be climbed over. The newer prisons have them.....if they can afford it so can they U.S. government.
2007-10-22 05:20:29 · answer #5 · answered by mhchicetawn 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Not Constitutionally, no.
Rather, if you're that down on the idea of 'the dole,' just try to end it.
2007-10-22 06:38:39 · answer #6 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
that sounds almost like a fair trade,I'm not racist in my thinking . i don't care who you are as long as you are responsible and don't expect me to pay your way
2007-10-22 05:14:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I guess you mean the vets who are mentally damage by war will be deported, after all they fought for you to be free, and you want to kick them out of America because they are no longer of any use..
2007-10-22 05:32:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
You cons are confusing me, one day you're cheering the record low unemployment numbers the next your whining about all those that don't work...
Which is it?
2007-10-22 05:14:54 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I like that idea a lot!
2007-10-22 05:16:19 · answer #10 · answered by Sit'nTeach'nNanny 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋