English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am not talking about God, Allah, or any other religious teachings.

2007-10-22 04:50:46 · 17 answers · asked by bregweidd 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

we are born spiritual, emotional, mental and physical... everything on earth emits information into nature (from stones and water to plant life and animals)... these messages bounce off of each other until it creates a reaction... this reaction is called evolution... along with life nature also evolves as a collection of lessons learned till it recongnises healthy habits it's gained.. and this cycle has continued for thousands or millions of years... religions and the people who start and run them seek to claim ownership of this information... that is where we get god... humans placing themselves above this natural event... now to many beleive this sounds fine until we take into consideration the actual damage to nature this has causes... and as religion took the forfront in controling the human population through their manipulation of information.. nature continues to evolve... reading what humans do as errors... for it doesn't get corrected with nature direction till we find ourself on the end of natural selection cycle rather than the healing cycle... so as the earth, the plant life, insects and other animals begin to benefit from nature's healing cycles humans find themselves receiving illnesses that evolve faster than their science can keep up with... We the human race have squandered what nature has given us, and through religions practice constant rejection of nature's authority to functions as it does... so although "spirit" exists we have constantly been fed the wrong idea of it's purpose through religions.... christians are a loud example of why... as they constantly and visciously attack any definition beyond their narrow religious views... in the end when one says ours is the true religion, they mean to say that they would be the ones to deny nature the best.. not something positive in the end..

2007-10-22 05:04:14 · answer #1 · answered by Gyspy 4 · 1 0

Burden of information. No, the burden of information is on people who say there's a large-being. without data for his or her declare, and no reason to have self assurance it, people who don't think it do not would desire to coach something. you are able to't practice that there is not a pink unicorn orbiting the solar between Jupiter and Saturn. the burden is on me to grant some reason to think of there is. i don't attempt to disprove god; I merely keep asking what reason or data there is to think of there is one in all those concern. And while human beings make fake claims approximately evolution, i attempt to describe what it surely is (however i think of that's a separate concern). you are able to't practice the nonexistence of a non-existent being; that isn't how data works. Dawkins would not think of there is a few piece of information available that disproves god's lifestyles; he's familiar with the character of information greater useful than that. He argues based on the unreasonableness of perception in god. Edit: in case you have never heard of the Flying Spagheti Monster, attempt typing the word into your famous seek engine. that's an option to god theory up via an superb nut who become combating the coaching of theology in technology instructions. in order that which you be attentive to what everyone seems to be bearing on.

2016-11-09 04:50:16 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Look up the word, 'gestalt'.

It refers to thoughts, or experiences that are more than the sum of their parts. I am like that, and perhaps you are too.

The union of two parts, making a whole, is called synthesis.
Spirit, or spiritual entities are synthetic, but very real, and alive.

example; when men reach out with one hand, and clasp another's hand, a bond is formed (spiritual). Biblicly, it's known as covenant. The covenant knows no time, or spatial restrictions, and is as permanent as we make it. A covenant with God, is eternal.

2007-10-22 05:26:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If by the "spiritual", you mean the emotions, feelings, thoughts, imagination, attitudes, cravings, yearnings, dreams, aspirations and character of people, then the proof is simply the fact that people experience these and will report that they experience them. One must keep in mind however, that other than in their experience, these things do not exist in the physical world.

2007-10-22 04:57:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You basically can not disprove anything. Prove, yes, given the right evidence, but disprove no.

2007-10-22 04:54:27 · answer #5 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 0 0

Watch Hauntings on the Travel Channel

2007-10-22 04:54:33 · answer #6 · answered by micheal777 2 · 0 1

There is some mild proof of ghosts but nothing definitive. So maybe. We just might have to wait a while until technology catches up with purpose.

2007-10-22 04:54:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

no. Spiritual is ones own opinions about .....spirituality.

I grew up thinking spiritual meant ...to love god.

however, as i matured i came to know people who's spirituality has nothing to do with a divine figure. But their own selves.

You cannot bend someones beliefs to fit your proof.

2007-10-23 05:15:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You cannot prove existence or nonexistence of something that reveals itself only through personal experience, because personal experience is, by defenition, entirely subjective.

What can be proven is effect, as this can be verified by others and objective studies can be made.

2007-10-22 05:01:36 · answer #9 · answered by Kris G 3 · 1 0

Define "spiritual" before you ask for proof.

~ Eric Putkonen

2007-10-22 04:55:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers