Prominent creation scientist Em Adjineri has recently developed a faith-based alternative to Einstein's Theory of General Relativity. Her alternative is called the Law of Intelligent Space-Time (or IST).
Since a theory can be wrong and a law has to be right, the Law of IST is better than the Theory of General Relativity.
General relativity says that space-time curves around massive bodies, thereby deflecting the vectors of any close bodies with mass from the temporal dimension into the spatial dimensions. This is supposedly what causes acceleration due to gravity.
But there is one flaw in General Relativity: how does space-time know how much it's supposed to curve? The only possible way is if it was intelligently designed with free will. The space-time uses its free will to curve around massive bodies because the will of space-time is in accordance with the will of God.
Since General Relativity is just a theory and IS is a law, IS is better and should be taught in schools.
2007-10-22 04:33:34 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
The last line should read "Since General Relativity is just a theory and IST is a law, IST is better and should be taught in schools."
2007-10-22 04:34:36 · update #1
"I saw warped space, now I'm a believer."
Without a trace of doubt in my mind.
2007-10-22 04:43:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The basis of intelligent design Paraphrasing the creation story and approximate history until today (Extremely old school style) By David Watts 2/09 (Literal) Day 1 Genesis 1:1-5 states that God created the earth. On this first day the earth was a void in space staring at the sun. This was not the earth we know today. No plants and animals, a complete barren ball of water as land had not yet been introduced. (Literal) Day 2 Genesis 1:6-8 states that God separated the waters above and below. A shield of ice or mist was introduced into the atmosphere. The expanse between the waters was called “sky” and this was the second day. Basically, this is when He made our atmosphere. (Literal) Day 3 Genesis 1:9-13 states that God created land and divided it from the water. The world looked somewhat “Pangea” like in form, as the continents were all together. God than created all the plant life we see today. (Literal) Day 4 Genesis 1:14-19 states that God created the stars in the sky and the moon and set the revolution of the earth in motion around the sun. The Earth was not capable of sustaining life before this step. (Literal) Day 5 Genesis 1:20-23 states that God created the creatures of the sea and the air and he blessed them. Incidentally, this is the first blessing in the Bible. (Literal) Day 6 Genesis 1:24-31 states that God created all the land animals and than humans and gave us humans dominion over the Earth and told us to take care of it. (Literal) Day 7 Genesis 2:1-3 states that God rested on the seventh day and made it holy as an example for us to use one day a week as a day of rest. There was about 2000 years between the great flood when the waters above came and flooded the land and creation. Before the flood, people lived to be several hundred years old and the differing atmospheric conditions allowed for constant growth. As for dinosaurs, there were never any different species than what we see today. For example, if my dog never stopped growing over his 600-year life I’m sure he’d be as big as a house! These truths have often been cast aside but never disproven. During the flood the earth below the waters broke apart creating the continents we have today. The flood also dramatically changed the atmosphere, as there is no longer water above the earth. The new atmosphere accounts for the differing atmospheric changes and climate we see today as before the flood the earth would have been fairly temperate. After the flood there was 2000 years before God came to Earth in the form of Jesus. It has almost been 2000 years since Jesus came. His return is foretold in Revelation and many prophesies about that return are being fulfilled now. If you have any questions about creationism please feel free to let me know.
2016-05-24 04:12:57 · answer #2 · answered by iva 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ahh...but just becasue she calls it a Law, doesnt make it one. This is science remember. It has to be scientifically proven in order to become scientific law. Which i dont think faith-based ideas can be scientifically proven. Mainly because they are faith-based. Faith is a basically loophole in science. If you cant really prove something, then one just believes that it is possible, even though one has no ground to stand on other than their thoughts. So that pretty much makes her idea a hypothesis, or even an inference, which based on your scientific heirarchy, would be lesser than any theory.
Now, that is all not to mention the fact that countless predictions made from the Theory of Relativity, of how the universe works, have and are continually proven. There are only a couple that we cant prove...yet. So I would say that Relativity is well on its way to becoming scientific law.
2007-10-22 04:46:06 · answer #3 · answered by Toledo Engineer 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Of course, and the value of pi needs to be in agreement with the Bible. Chronicles 4:2-5 and First Kings 7:23 indicate that pi is 3.00, not 3.14159 that heretics use. Since I have replaced pi with its Bible value, my new hats do not fit. Genesis to Revelation indicate that the sky is a firmament or solid dome a few miles above us, so the Sun, Moon, planets and stars are small lights on that dome. We have much work to make scientific theories agree with the Bible.
2007-10-22 04:49:04 · answer #4 · answered by miyuki & kyojin 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
How do you know what's right if you can't see relativity? Proof that goddidit! Oh, and maybe I can give you some quotes from some purty smart folks to back it up.........after all, science is based on famous quotes taken out of context, right?
2007-10-22 04:44:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm nominating Dr. Em Adjineri for a Noble prize in something unimaginable.
2007-10-22 04:37:45 · answer #6 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 10⤊ 0⤋
By no means. In addition, do not replace the THEORY of evolution with anything else and especially, don't call it science. It is just a theory.
2007-10-22 04:38:08 · answer #7 · answered by Mutations Killed Darwin Fish 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Reading that gave me such a headache. I think I need the law of ibuprofen now.
2007-10-22 05:00:00 · answer #8 · answered by Cinthia Round house kicking VT 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I see an Ig Noble Prize in somebody's future...
2007-10-22 04:44:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
yes, its just a Theory after all...
i also propose we kill Pythagorean theory and replace it with god's right triangle law...only god can decide if a triangle is right, or wrong...
(chuckles)
2007-10-22 04:37:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋