2007-10-22 03:13:55 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No. He would have refused counsel.
2007-10-22 03:16:59 · answer #1 · answered by Suen 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They didn't have the adversarial system back then, so legal representation wasn't all that significant. Back then the arbitrator lead the investigation and questioned suspects and witnesses, the opposing sides were not responsible for presenting their own cases. So there's really not much that legal representation could have accomplished.
2007-10-22 10:24:19 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus is the perfect example of a plan gone bad. It wast till the early Romans and Jews figured that there was money to be made and power to be had if they controlled a populace that was uneducated.
2007-10-22 10:20:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Things would have been different if he didn't die on the cross. We would be without hope! Our ransom would remain unpaid!
He went through it for the joy set before him - that joy was the thought of you and me in eternity with Him!
Crazy, isn't it??
2007-10-22 10:21:21 · answer #4 · answered by rosemary w 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He should have got OJ's legal team.But it was a fit up anyway,Jebus didn't do anything wrong other than break holy laws and claim to have fulfilled holy prophecies.
2007-10-22 10:21:05 · answer #5 · answered by Mike Oxlong 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope1 The fix was in. God was the lead counsel for the prosecution.
2007-10-22 10:19:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. He fulfilled the Scriptures. It was supposed to happen.
2007-10-22 10:16:06 · answer #7 · answered by hopflower 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
he should find himself a good Jewish lawyer, and that would postpone his sentence for ever.
But Romans had a habit of killing Jewish lawyers first and asking questions later, so Jesus would only gain another name to die for him.
2007-10-22 10:19:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was never found guilty by Ceasar, read the bible again.
2007-10-22 12:06:00 · answer #9 · answered by decks 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes,the verdict would have been,'Acquittal with honor.'
2007-10-22 10:38:29 · answer #10 · answered by brkshandilya 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋