English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Christians may view it as taking care of God's backyard before the "New Jerusalem" decends from the heavens. (as in Revelations)
Buddhists may view it as taking care of their own universal consciousness.
Pagans may view it as taking care of their mother, Gaia.

2007-10-22 01:36:46 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

23 answers

Greetings!

The bad news is: shoulda`, coulda``, didn`t.

Natural Cycles are bad enough-we seem to have a penchant for destruction by allowing greedy people and corporations free will to persue the Money God, which as a by-product, pollutes the Earth, Sea, and Sky.

Our Response-Ability has been limited by Politicians-get out the Vote!

/!\

2007-10-22 05:36:59 · answer #1 · answered by Ard-Drui 5 · 1 0

Human being are responsible for the problems, that they are presented with, related to the Earth. If they ignor, or don't try to solve any of the intense problem we face, in regards to the earth or so many other issues, these problem will grow even bigger. If we don't want a terrible future, we have to become more moral and responsible spiritual beings, God will help with guidance if sought, but we have to earn a brighter future, by dong the proper work.

2007-10-22 01:46:43 · answer #2 · answered by astrogoodwin 7 · 1 0

I wouldn't say we have a specific responsibility mandated by nature or a divine being. However, it is absolute foolishness to ignore the possible consequences. We as a race will experience the repercussions of our actions. The more we pollute, the more filth we have to live within. The more we exploit, the less resources we'll have later. The less we care about it now, the more we'll be forced to care about it later.

2007-10-22 12:12:23 · answer #3 · answered by Nightwind 7 · 0 0

Its a moral imperative to cause as little impact to your environment as possible. That includes everything in it, even other humans, plants, animals, and the earth itself. In order to live, some things must be disturbed, some things must die (animals and plants for food and shelter, not humans), but we can do our living in a responsible manner nonetheless.

It is sad that not everyone thinks of the big picture and we collectively have an approach that does not respect the environment.

2007-10-22 01:52:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If we wish to survive as a species,it would benefit us to not pollute our house."Taking care of the Earth"means different things to different people.I am strongly against littering,strongly for getting into renewable energy such as solar.I am strongly for our national,and world,parks.I do not go to extremes however.Because a spotted salamander is "endangered"we shut off hundreds of thousands of acres from any use.I have no use for a spotted salamander,I don't think it is my duty to protect every animal from extinction,they have gone extinct before.I could care less.This doesn't mean I am against the environment,it simply means I haven't joined the "environment religion"that fanatics have,trying to stop the very process that got us here.I also thing man made Global Warming is another religion,a selfish one at that.All the hoopla about "planet in peril"what a crock.The planet is fine,it hyas warmed before,many times.To think that man can be so arrogant as to think they can stop global warming is mind boggling.On top of that,history shows warming periods have been good times,COOLING periods led to bad times.Still,otherwise rational people blindly follow their messiah,Al Gore,like we caused it,or that we can,or should,stop a NATURAL cycle.Because of this,these "new religion"fundies would try to lump me in the category of "not caring about the environment"which is a deceptive claim,meant to put one on defense if they disagree with their man made global warming apocolypse.We have a responsibility to keep the Earth livable.We have no responsibility to try to keep everything "as is"It goes against nature,and I could give a damn less if a species of fly goes extinct.I care very deeply for the environment,I just don't buy the whole package,only the reasonable ones

2007-10-22 01:59:29 · answer #5 · answered by nobodinoze 5 · 0 0

Apart from the religious view I think we have to care for the planet for the sake of our children and so on,how terrible would it be for a new generation of children to grow up never seeing a live animal or bird or fish,never to look up at a clear blue sky etc.

2007-10-22 01:45:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No matter what God one believes, Yes I do believe that it's our responsibility to take care of our mother earth. Remember we breath air freely, we don't pay for that. We also enjoying a lot of natures mountains, rivers, seas forest, water falls that human cannot make it as nice as it is....

2007-10-22 01:52:49 · answer #7 · answered by Ces 1 · 0 0

i'm a Roman Catholic, raised and self-affirmed. i detect that my faith now no longer basically helps environmentalism- it encourages it. there's a concept in Christianity, greater effectively espoused via some sects than others, it relatively is regular as stewardship. This takes some important segments of the Bible, especially contained interior the previous testomony, and says (rapidly) that God has entrusted the Earth to human beings, and we would desire to subsequently have a tendency to His creation as a perfect variety of compliment. determine out wikipedia ("stewardship (theology)") for some verse references =] What i in my opinion like ideal to the theology of stewardship is that it would not enumerate technical fixes. it relatively is not any longer written, "Thou shalt now no longer use incandescent lights furnishings furnishings," yet as a replace encourages human beings to nicely known the effect that their in all danger trivial judgements make. it relatively is properly designed so human beings take concerns of ecologically suitable and incorrect into their own palms based upon the information it relatively is available. I greater suitable have faith that this non secular call to sustainability helps make certain a basically international for the persons who're to return. it relatively is clever, stewardship is robust sufficient to be compelling yet muted sufficient to enable flexibility. Now if basically greater Christians ought to take it into attention...

2016-12-18 14:20:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

We, as humans need to act responsibly when it comes to caring for anything. If you are referring to the "global warming" then I believe that there is nothing to do about this as it is a naturally occurring phenomenon, and absolutely NOT caused by humans.

2007-10-22 01:44:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Earth is the only home we have, at least for the moment. It would be irresponsible to not take care of it, regardless of religion.

2007-10-22 01:44:43 · answer #10 · answered by Sharon M 6 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers