What does this word mean, Jesus used it.?

Question

It says in Mark 14:56–59

"For many bore false witness against him, and their witness did not agree. And some stood up and bore false witness against him, saying, "We heard him say, 'I will destroy this temple that is made with hands, and in three days I will build another, not made with hands.''' Yet not even so did their testimony agree."

The word he used for hands is "ต้มยำ" which does not actually look like it means hands. What is this word? Is it a symbolic something or other that he used to convey the idea of hands?

Answer 1

it means his cousin's baby's momma's sister in law was there and she said that they be using abestos and shiiit.

Answer 2

Mark 14:56-59

Many false witnesses volunteered, but they contradicted each other.
Finally some men stood up to lie about him and said, "We heard him say, 'I will destroy this Temple made with human hands and in three days I will build another, made without human hands!' "

But even then they didn't get their stories straight!

Answer 3

The verses you gave supplied its own answer, dear asker. You see the speaker in verse 58 is a false witness. What is false about his statement? The original dialog is found in another verse in the bible that says something like this: "Destroy this temple and i will build it in three days". Meaning, it is the Jews that should destroy the temple not Christ and the temple is not that of made of rocks and marbles but his body that will be resurected in three days after the Jews destroyed him in the cross.

Answer 4

Made by men/people. People build things by using their hands. The first temple He is speaking of is a building, a structure, built by/with the hands of men. The second temple He speaks of is Himself. His own body. His body is a person and as you know, our body isn't something people can build from wood, rock, brick, mortar, etc.. In three days. Jesus was dead for three days then came back to life in a glorious (human like-but not fully human) body. aka---the first, and real, Easter.

Answer 5

this is yet another occasion that proves that the international will try all they are in a position to to disprove the Bible. What they are superb at is taken what so ever verses from the Bible and leaving different helping ones to tutor their factors. the international is so fastened on Christ dying being His final, and this is not so. enable’s in simple terms take it on the bypass for a 2nd for the reason that this is the place you're inventory at. those 3 gospels are genuine in this type: Did you no longer comprehend that there have been a minimum of three diverse language on the time of the Romans? possibly you don’t comprehend why this fact became into written above the Christ’s head in 3 diverse languages: “this is Jesus, the king of the Jews”, in Greek, Latin and Hebrew. confident, Jesus pronounced all of those 3 issues of all 3 authors. in basic terms that they do no longer look to be focusing on an analogous factor. each and all of the gospel considered Jesus in yet in any different case. because of the fact the “Son of adult males”, because of the fact the “King”, because of the fact the “Son of God”. The final words of Jesus Christ wasn’t got here across at His dying as you theory. Christ final words in the international have been, “...yet ye shall obtain ability, after that the Holy Ghost is bump into you: and ye would be witnesses unto me the two in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost area of the earth.” (Acts a million:8). If the international proceed believing that Christ at His dying, became into the final of Him, they are in for a huge shocked, and that they're going to proceed death of their sins. Did you no longer comprehend that those issues have been written of Him way before He became into even born of the flesh interior the previous testomony.

Answer 6

We have here Christ's condemnation before the great council of the Jews. Peter followed; but the high priest's fire-side was no proper place, nor his servants proper company, for Peter: it was an entrance into temptation. Great diligence was used to procure false witnesses against Jesus, yet their testimony was not equal to the charge of a capital crime, by the utmost stretch of their law. He was asked, Art thou the Son of the Blessed? that is, the Son of God. For the proof of his

being the Son of God, he refers to his second coming. In these outrages we have proofs of man's enmity to God, and of God's free and unspeakable love to man. (Mk 14:66-72)

Answer 7

Jesus means that He will have the temple (man made) destroyed but that God will resurrect His body (new Temple) after the crucifixion. God wants to put His commandments and laws into mankind's hearts and minds. The Body of Christ composed of all believers is the new Temple and thus, the new Church.

Answer 8

That word appears to be of Thai origin....

A Thai dish most popular in Thailand and among foreigners is tom yam (also spelt tom yum [ต้มยำ]), a fiery-hot, sour and very aromatic soup prepared from shrimps (tom yam gung [ต้มยำกุ้ง]), chicken (tom yam gai [ต้มยำไก่]) or fish (tom yam pla [ต้มยำปลา]). The soup is flavoured with loads of chiles, lime juice, fish sauce and fresh spices: galanga, lemon grass and kaffir lime leaves. It is served topped with aromatic greens, usually basil (horapha) or coriander.

Your word: "ต้มยำ"

The Thai word : "Tom Yam" (also spelled,"Tom Yum") = ต้มยำ

Answer 9

That doesn't look Greek OR Aramaic to me. New Testament scriptures were written mostly in Greek and partially in Aramaic. This is a tough one. I'll go try to find which language you are using and get back to ya....

Answer 10

what script are you using - it looks neither like Hebrew nor Aramaic?

The usual translation of the passage that you render as "that is made with hands" is: "that men have made".

And the passage you show as "not made with hands" is usually translated as "not made by men".

Answer 11

it sounds like (slaves) people forced to work for money without believing in what they were doing. Or it's possible it meant the content of the temple were people who believed in the laws of man over god (flawed beliefs).