Funny.
2007-10-21 17:07:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Penguin_Bob 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
New York City!
2007-10-21 15:02:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by krystlerb 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
NYC would not have a particular difficulty. that's like this whenever you reside in a vacationer trip spot. San Francisco is terrible too - maximum individuals would be unable topersistent the hills (even quite community individuals), and those strolling seem to think of that standard pedestrian risk-free practices rules no longer quickly don't be conscious to them while they want that photograph of the trolley - or despite. The Golden Gate bridge being a vacationer internet site particularly sucks. that's how we get from Marin to the city - so having it clogged with vintage firetruck excursion autos is exceedingly painful. Its a bridge - you are able to discover it greater useful in case you're no longer ON IT - yet all and sundry has to bypass it. although, i'm conscious that the $$$ tourism factors helps shop the city going. basically considering the fact which you reside there would not make it "YOUR" city besides. all and sundry has a astonishing to the sidewalk, and there is no minimum velocity shrink for strolling.
2016-10-13 11:34:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
? New York City
2007-10-21 15:03:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Vince 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
N= New
Y= York
C= City
2007-10-21 16:11:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by sharaont 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
new york city
2007-10-21 15:04:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by colorado 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
new york city
2007-10-21 15:03:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by R K 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
new york city
2007-10-21 15:03:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
New York City, Not your cat, now you can, not your cheese, pick one. New York City is right.
2007-10-21 15:04:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You posted in the right section.
2007-10-21 15:02:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lady Geologist 7
·
3⤊
1⤋