Little Ice Age?

Question

Why don't environmentalist ever talk about the Little Ice Age? When discussing weird weather?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ice_Age#Dating_of_the_Little_Ice_Age

Answer 1

They don't want to send mixed signals. They're so busy trying to sell the global warming idea that they don't want to admit that they really don't know what will happen and that really anything is possible including no major change, or possibly many areas get dramatically colder.

Answer 2

The little ice age isn't skipped over in fact looking it in a information set whilst doing a palaeoclimate reconstruction on the main suitable term helps to function greater validation to an age kind. "Ignoring stuff seems to be the main suitable thank you to win an AGW factor. like the outcomes cyclic earth orbit inconsistencies do no longer in all danger result climate, neither do sunspots, purely evil guy and his hideous potential utilization. Given: we are overpopulated. could we commit mass Sepuku? Slit our wrists with palms joined making a music Goombaya? The snake barrel fills...." differences in earths orbit (milankovich cycles) happen over tens of 1000's of years and on the present cycle we are on we could continuously be cooling. image voltaic activity is falling and temperatures are increasing. If image voltaic activity became into the forcing factor temperatures could be falling with it.

Answer 3

They do. I show this graph with it all the time.

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison_png

Things like this are caused by variations in solar radiation. But we measure the Sun all the time. And so we know that this is not what's causing global warming. More here:

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11645

The bottom line (note the source):

"While evidence suggests fluctuations in solar activity can affect climate on Earth, and that it has done so in the past, the majority of climate scientists and astrophysicists agree that the sun is not to blame for the current and historically sudden uptick in global temperatures on Earth, which seems to be mostly a mess created by our own species."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258342,00.html

Boomer Wisdom - The 1930s were only unusually warm in the US (and not by much, 2007 is very likely to break the record). In the world they weren't warm at all (like you I get my data from NASA):

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A2.lrg.gif

Answer 4

Researchers always tell you that more research funding is needed. ..i think It is that global climate is moving in a direction that makes abrupt climate change more probable, that these dynamics lie beyond the capability of many of the models used in IPCC reports, and the consequences of ignoring this may be large. For those of us living around the edge of the N. Atlantic Ocean, we may be planning for climate scenarios of global warming that are opposite to what might actually occur.

Answer 5

Mainly because it ended 200 years ago. The LIA was an event that was caused primarily by a period of almost no sunspot activity, the period being known as the Maunder Minimum. It was the climax of a 600 year period of cooling in which average temps fell by over 0.5°C, this cooling was brought about by a declining trend in energy received from the Sun (total solar irradiance or TSI). By 1800 things had returned to normal, sunspot activity had resumed, TSI was back to it's long term average and global temps had risen back to their pre LIA levels (long term average of 13.5°C).

Temps then levelled off and only began to pick up again as solar activity and atmopsheric greenhouse gas levels began to increase.

Answer 6

they want to pretend the weather has been constant & unchanging untill recently. although 100% of all/any serious studies ever done shows the climate has always gone through cycles, most more extreme than the ones that have took place since humans appeared on the planet . these include tropical weather at the poles & nearly the entire planet frozen solid at other times.
thats the same reason they never talk about the many possible benefits to humanity of future global warming. it doesnt fit into their political agenda,which is all they care about.

Answer 7

Because that would bring up the point that global warming is a natural cycle of the planet and that this is the same thing. The global warming believers cherry pick the data to make it appear as though it is our fault when really it is natural.

Answer 8

Hi. The verdict is still out, but if you look at the warmest global temperatures on record will will find the most of the records have been set in the last decade. If this trend continues we may be forced to consider climate change to be real.

Answer 9

the little ice age happened before the plague ..it is said that the cold temps may have been a cause of the plague

Answer 10

Because there is no foreseeable prospect of a Little Ice Age. But there is a frightening prospect of no ice.