English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-21 12:02:32 · 16 answers · asked by Kiran 2 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

16 answers

As a person Hillary Clinton is probably not much different than any other person. As a politician she is not much different than any other politician. As a candidate for president she is a poor choice. She has a tendency to tell people what they want to hear, she is willing to do what ever it takes to win the election. She is trying to buy votes by giving everyone money. She supports illegal immigration, she has tried for 15 years to get a health program that no one else (democrats or republicans) will back and she blames the problem on someone else; eight of those years were while Bill was president and she could not get anywhere with it. She can not stop complaining about how government has failed us (she has been a part of that government and if she is as good as she would want us to believe she could have helped improve the problem). I would not trust Hillary Clinton as our president. Do I like her - I have nothing against her as a person but I would not want her as president of the United States. She says she opposes the war but she voted for it without even reading the intelligence reports. She says she would not have voted for the war if she knew then what she knows now; it would have helped if she had taken time to study the issue before making such a drastic decision. She supported the recent move to expand the health care program for children (SCHIP); changes in that program would have made health care available to illegal aliens at tax payer’s expense. She claims she has the best experience for the office; what experience, what has she accomplished? Just being around the establishment does not qualify a person. A man spending twenty years in prison has experience in the criminal justice system but does that qualify him to be the warden or a Chief of Police? I would hope people do not vote for her just because they like her! Her goal is not to become president because of what she can do for our country but rather to become the first lady president!

2007-10-22 02:20:57 · answer #1 · answered by amnestiswrong 5 · 1 0

HITLERY Clinton is exactly what this country DOESN'T need if we want to stay OUT of a Police State. She is a COMMIE *****, PERIOD.

Hey, when you proclaim you want people to be a COLLECTIVE, you kill the individual. that is what ALL Council on Foreign relations type politicians are about; killing Individualism. And when you kill Individualism, you kill FREEDOM and everything you THINK you will have tomorrow.

HITLERY Clinton is a murderer of FREEDOM. So are all other Presidential candidates but Ron Paul. Everyone else wants to microchip you. Do some research on the CFR.

Here's some proof: http://www.usresolve.org/content/index.php?news=article&id=17

The CFR has, since the 1920s, undermined the sovereignty of the United States, and continues to do so by the U.S. involvement in the U.N., GATT, the WTO, NAFDA and the likely North American Union. Thanks to the CFR, our country is in shambles, by design. As former CFR director David Rockefeller writes in his Memoires, no.....

2007-10-21 18:19:17 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

to respond to your question, No. Do you keep in mind some years in the past while that guy named Dean ran for president. He became the front runner of the Democratic occasion for just about a 300 and sixty 5 days. He lost the 1st regularly occurring and all and sundry concept that it became a fluke. Then he lost the 2d and 0.33, etc. The media had him picked through fact the subsequent president through fact of his polls, yet they did no longer pan out interior the vote casting sales area. the element is, do no longer hardship regarding the polls from the media, hardship regarding the vote casting consequences.

2016-10-13 11:12:31 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I don't like her because I think she is far more dishonest than even her husband was. I think she is cold and calculative and seems to have the wool pulled over her supporters eyes. She flip flops and makes suggestions and declarations without studying them first, just so she can be saying something different. Waste of time and a bad move for our country.

2007-10-21 12:36:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

She has what I consider a lack of adequate experience in an elective office. I do not believe that the US Congress is an adequate training ground for the presidency. I believe that the best presidents had experience as a governor of one of the states.

2007-10-21 12:27:26 · answer #5 · answered by Bibs 7 · 2 1

Nope

2007-10-21 22:06:26 · answer #6 · answered by DOIN' RIGHT AINT GOT NO END 3 · 0 1

Decode this lyrics " She a lady"
Why not?
She's a fighter too.
Her husband must have stayed on the side-line.
Cannot take it.
What do you think?

2007-10-21 22:22:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not because I am a woman. I think this country needs her ethics and standards. She is a smart lady with empathy.

2007-10-21 13:59:20 · answer #8 · answered by mary 4 · 0 1

I don`t like her...just that I like Barak Obama better...he seems very sincere and not a liar

2007-10-21 12:06:38 · answer #9 · answered by mzell 4 · 2 1

No, because she voted for the amnesty bill.

2007-10-21 14:39:45 · answer #10 · answered by imback_missme 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers