I want to confirm myself that nobel peace price winners are usually leftists and dreamers. Do you agree with me? Have they done any good for the world except their dreams?
2007-10-21 10:59:01 · 10 answers · asked by fedup 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
mostly...since about 1970 anyway..the Nobels used to mean something and then they started giving them to the Arafats and the Carters and the (shudders)Gores..now they are mostly meaningless news ops
2007-10-21 11:56:04 · answer #1 · answered by Dr Sardonicus 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
While the blog might be interesting, I doubt that it will be as complete or accurate as the organization itself.
If you really want to know about the Nobel Laureates, http://nobelprize.org/.
Have they done any good? The first winner also founded the Red Cross. Most people would agree that the organization has done a lot of good over the years.
What is wrong with being a dreamer? There is a saying that those who have no dreams have very little else that matters.
If you are simply looking to confirm what you already believe, then this won't matter, but if you really want to know, then do a bit of research on the subject. I disagree that being correct is a "right only" position. However, the left has no corner on "what is right" either. The truth rarely picks American political positions.
2007-10-21 11:54:31 · answer #2 · answered by karen star 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you realize the suitable ingredient he did develop into the Stimulus which prevented a melancholy. it somewhat is a fact, and you're able to twist it any way you like, however the Stimulus saved the financial gadget from the dumpster. Ask any economist, conservative or liberal. the sole valid argument that I see is that there develop into no longer sufficient money interior the Stimulus to place us over the actual. Peace comes at a value. Lives are in touch. The President won't be able to merely pull the plug on Iraq and Afghanistan. there's a schedule for our leaving. The Libyan human beings asked for the international's help in deposing a brutal dictator. President Obama worked with NATO and the UN to furnish them with air help. the completed international needs that dictator long gone. Revolution costs lives and patriots take unfavourable aspects.
2016-10-04 07:39:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yasser Arafat wasn't a Leftist.. he was a terrorist. Carter and Gore are jokes....albeit Leftist Jokes... The stupidities of the Nobel Committee diminish any of the recipients that may have actually deserved the prize. It is truly sad
2007-10-21 11:10:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Liberals.
http://truewordtoday.blogspot.com/
2007-10-21 11:01:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a political thing now,mostly...the Peace prize part anyway...the science end of it still has some meaning but the commission mostly finds some liberal figurehead to bestow it on to enhance the message of the day....ex: gore and the warming farce....
2007-10-21 16:38:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theodore Roosevelt won the Prize for negotiating the end of the Russo-Japanese War. I think he did a lot besides dreaming. And I don't think anyone would have considered him to be a Marxist of any degree.
2007-10-21 11:22:12 · answer #7 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
About as far left as one can get! Worthless, Name one thing Al Gore did for Peace?
2007-10-21 11:13:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What did Oblame-o do to get one in 2009? LMAO!!! Pathetic.
2015-04-09 07:48:28 · answer #9 · answered by MARK 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends on the category
2007-10-21 11:15:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋