Religion in general?

Question

Many people have stated that the world would be better off without religion.

Is my understanding that this world wouldn't suffer anymore war correct? Is this what is to be achieved?

Isn't pride in your country just as bad? After all, you're supposed to die for your country (the same expression could be said as "kill for your country" but that doesn't look as nice). Hell, if you refuse to go to war, you're branded as a coward and an unfit citizen with references to your grandparents who fought major wars (but tell you, the children, never to go through it)

Why is it, specifically, that religion is a problem and not forms of Governments and other belief system?

I've always seen ANY belief, in anything, to be the reason why people do anything, good OR bad and not one in particular. Just curious as even Atheists come off as rather angry so they are no different. We, as individuals, regardless, I believe are the reasons for all problems

Thoughts?

BTW, my comment is not a stab at Atheists or religious people, but if anyone wants to take it to heart, then everyone or no one can place their hand up

Answer 1

Actually, i don't think society as we know it could exist if religion never played a role in earlier societies. During the Renaissance, MANY MANY works of art were made in imitation of religious motifs. The most astounding buildings in the world were built with spiritual/religious purposes-- the pyramids, the cathedrals.. Religion actually motivated earlier civilizations to go beyond the mundane routines of life to create amazing things. I think this way of thinking influenced the early scientists and influenced US as people to think beyond the basic human needs of food and sex

I don't believe religion is a problem in itself, but it's when whackos pervert religion and turn it into a vehicle or justification for their own interests that makes it a problem. There are whackos everywhere, but when there's a religiously-motivated crime, atheists will go ape-S### and jump at the opportunity to denounce religion. Yeah, believe it or not but Stalin was an atheist..

I've met a lot of atheists who have denounced religion because of its inherent "intolerance". Well, when you presume to know things about religion when you don't have a real grasp of religious doctrine, you don't have a leg to stand on.

Answer 2

Anything that stops people from asking questions is likely to cause problems, especially when used by an "authority." This not only includes religion, but nationalism and politics. Both can be dangerous, as WWII showed. If religion did not exist, some conflicts would be fixed, and humanity might be better off on the whole (especially in the Middle East), but humans would find another meaningless excuse to hate one another - based on culture, traditions, clothing, race, gender - you name it.

There is no such thing as Utopia, no matter how obvious the culprits.

Answer 3

Hi. I think the phrase is more like "religion has been the cause of more wars than any other reason" or words like this. We humans have a need for family, including country sometimes, but even that does make for peace. Muslims kill Muslims because they are not the right KIND of Muslim. Christians kill Christians because they are not the right KIND of Christians. Americans kill Americans because they are not the right KIND of American. (Black vs white, northerner vs southerner, cop vs robber, etc.) The is much more to hatred than just religion.

Answer 4

"If God is accustomed to all and is accustomed to human form usually will disappoint him, why did he make the universe and us? some human beings informed me it somewhat is a try, yet does not he already understand the effect?" I sparkling up that concern via no longer being concerned. What concerns is that God created the universe. His motives are his motives, and he has no might desire to justify doing so, merely like I have not have been given any might desire to justify answering this question. "the object (sorry if i'm getting words incorrect, too) that states homosexuality is incorrect is the comparable article that states engaged on Sunday is incorrect, and that they the two look merely as intense - the punishment being loss of existence. Why do (particularly some) religious human beings positioned a lot emphasis on homosexuality being a sin and virtually forget approximately approximately different such sins?" i do no longer understand completely. i understand particularly some the sins interior the Bible have been recored interior the e book of regulation given to historical Israel. Are we historical Israelites? i did no longer think of so. The regulation develop into no longer meant for us, and because Jesus fulfilled the regulation on behalf of people who settle for him completely, we are actually not below it. As for why Homosexuality is greater emphasized than different sins, I have not have been given any actual answer to that. in accordance to my examine, Homosexuality isn't any worse than fornication (premarital intercourse) and adultery, and final I checked Jesus did no longer stone fornicators or adulterers anyplace he observed them. I blame Westboro Baptist Church for subsequently heavily distorting the Bible. "could or no longer this is that the visions and conversations with God have been brought about via magic mushrooms, returned interior the time the place human beings did no longer understand they might make you hallucinate?" could or no longer this is that they weren't? the two statements, yours and mine, have equivalent advantage, because of the fact there is no evidence the two way that magic mushrooms have been ever used. "Why did God supply us this quantity and form of unfastened will if he knew maximum might use it to sin?" because of the fact he knew that some persons might a minimum of attempt to no longer sin, and those are the persons he will spare.

Answer 5

I agree with what you have said.

You are right in my opinion.

But not so many people will actually understand what you said. Many people will make fun of you.

By the way...I am a american...and I would not die for my country. lol, in my opinion...its not worth it.
I would not die for something that doesn't care about me either, as selfish as it might sound

Answer 6

Personally I believe that most people need to believe in something, and I have absolutely nothing against it as long as:
- it is not against the secular laws of my country
- it stops at their doorstep and they don't try to force others to follow their beliefs outside their private life.

Answer 7

There may be LESS war without religion, but there would still be war.

Answer 8

We will never be able to get rid of religion; we just can't. Thats like asking the world to get rid of every race and ethnicity and just have one. It will never happen.

Answer 9

we most see ourselves as one not as separate people. religion separates people as do borders.

god and heaven arent outside of you but within. each and every human is not a single entity but part of a whole.

Answer 10

Removing religion from the world would be one small step towards removing all irrationality from the world.