English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-21 03:02:36 · 20 answers · asked by clusterfuster 1 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

They are twin sons of satan... well, okay, there is no Satan... but if there was one... they'd be it's children.

2007-10-21 03:05:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 4

Pat Robertson has had much more influence than Falwell. More than 150 members of the Bush administration graduated from Pat Robertson's Regent University.

more:
http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/exposes/robertson/general.htm

2007-10-21 03:12:44 · answer #2 · answered by Robin W 7 · 0 1

Jerry Falwell was a man of God. As is Pat Robertson. If you read or knew anything about them, you'd see that their lives reflected their devotion to Christ. Your hatred of men who speak the Truth is obvious and very sad. You must be a very sad person, dear one.

God bless!

2007-10-21 03:25:42 · answer #3 · answered by Devoted1 7 · 0 1

Falwell was an evil, manipulative hypocrite, but Pat Robertson's corrupt dealings with the African diamond trade make him more evil by a factor of several fold.

2007-10-21 03:11:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

They're both horrible, but it seems to me that Falwell said crazier stuff. Yet, have you ever seen Robertson on the 700 Club when they sit there and can "feel" people being healed? Talk about bizarre.
Edit: Mao and Stalin's atheism was not their motivation. They were dictators who happened to be atheists. Also, neither of those two claimed to know or control where people would go after they died or felt they alone knew what god wanted.

2007-10-21 03:07:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

God has not called on man to judge others. I can't find a common ground with Robertson's point of view on many things so I never watch. Rev. Falwell , I believe, was thoroughly in line with Bible teaching but often his delivery turned people against him. However, if either man led one lost sinner to the Lord, their work was not in vain.

2007-10-21 03:12:54 · answer #6 · answered by missingora 7 · 1 1

Who was worse: The atheist Stalin, or the athiest Mao ?

The consensus figure for those that Joseph Stalin murdered when he ruled the Soviet Union is 20,000,000
The consensus figure for those that Mao murdered is 77 million Chinese.

The number of peopele Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell murdered is: 0

2007-10-21 03:06:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Jerry was more of a dick. Pat is just way to much of an obvious source of entertainment to really be down on. Like that whole "God told me to run for President" thing. I guess that God must have wanted old Pat to look like a total a**. You couldn't buy better entertainment.

2007-10-21 03:07:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

The dead one had the "worse"-end of the twain;
For a dead end is "worse" than a l-o-n-g $ickness,
As is told us in Mt 9:16 ...12:45 ... 27:64; John 5:14.

Thank God "worst" doesn't even occur in the NT;
And the worse case scenario notably ends grace us,
as we all are one endure to the end to be SAVED(only):

The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

2007-10-21 03:17:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Both are/were major PIAs. The world is a better, safer place with Falwell out of it.

2007-10-21 03:06:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

You seem to be rather fixated on this Falwell person. I wonder why that is.

2007-10-21 03:05:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers