Hitler conquered all Europe and Stallin spread communism and captured Ethiopia In the other side of the world the Japanesse conqured all of Asia Philippines,China,Korea,etc....the Americans didn't know the war yet because they stay Isolated from the problems of other countries.
How will the Americans win if the Jap's conqured all of it's Asia (oh yea they make trade they should know what's going on) and the the Germany,Austria, and Italy finally took over all of Europe.How will the american win with little support to back them up if the U.S stayed neutral for soo long?
2007-10-20 12:12:13 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Reminder Russia is still open
2007-10-20 12:12:33 · update #1
This is a thought not a computer game stick playing video ga
2007-10-20 12:17:00 · update #2
Omg Hitler did not took over Russia moron he avoided them
2007-10-20 12:17:52 · update #3
It is one of the greatest "what ifs" in history. Many historians have asked that question, along with novelist Len Deighton in his book "SS-GB".
In the Spring 1998 issue of "Military History Quarterly" several military historians pondered similiar questions. Such eminent historians as John Keegan, UNC's Gerhard L. Weinberg, Boston U.'s David Fromkin.
The most likely outcome would be a world divided into three or four spheres: Nazi Germany, the United States, the Soviet Union, and/or Japan. There would be eventual conflicts between: USSR/Germany, USSR/Japan and/or USA/Japan.
2007-10-20 15:01:38 · answer #1 · answered by wichitaor1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hitler would not have been able to stop himself from invading Russia, it was his raison d'etre, so all else is not worth contemplating. However, Yes Hitler could have finished off Britain militarily, if only he'd left soldiering to the experts. Hitlers ridiculous stop orders off Dunkirk were at odds with the magnificent achievements by the Wehrmacht up until then. If he had over 500,000 British and Frenchmen, he could have persuaded for peace.
The reason Russia was able to defeat Germany was they traded land for time and Germany started later in 1941 than they wanted to and the winter set in and stopped them giving the Russians time to regroup. the delay was because il Duce was also a wannabe soldier and got the Italian (disgraceful to be called an) army to attack poor Greece and couldn't even handle that without German intervention.
The US was such an isolationist society that they would not have been able to invade Europe or even the Pacific unless their interests weredeemed to be under massive threat. The US was not after territorial control, but is after free trade. They can trade with the victors in Europe, Asia and Russia, so there will be no need for the US to attack.
2007-10-20 21:23:33 · answer #2 · answered by bubnkez 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, there's been ton of research done on alternate history theories of World War II.
I think that in general, most military historians would agree that invading the USSR was a fatal mistake for Germany. Had they not, and simply focused on wearing Britain down until they were willing to accept a peace proposal, little could have been done to stop them.
The Japanese moving across the Pacific was a different story and it seems almost inevtiable that America would have gone to war with them, Pearl Harbour was pre-emptive on their part.
But if Germany forced Britain to accept terms of peace or even was successful in invading and occupying them, America wouldn't have been able to have any effect on Europe. They would have no bases from which to launch air attacks upon German occupied territory, let alone launch any kind of ground invasion.
Hitler's overruling of his generals at every turn was his fatal mistake. He was successful in politics but horrible as a military leader.
2007-10-20 12:19:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Germany actually would've won,if the English Army hadn't escaped at Dunkirk ,if Hitler had not turned his back on Britain to fight Russia and if the Japanese had attacked Russia instead of Hawaii,there's a lot more mistakes the main one being Hitler should've relegated himself to minister of propaganda and let the Generals do the planning
2007-10-20 12:58:17 · answer #4 · answered by Will 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't know if this is the point you're trying to make but, it shows that if the U.S Had not gotten involved, even though the war wasn't on U.S. soil, the whole of history would have changed.
2007-10-20 12:27:37 · answer #5 · answered by †Lawrence R† 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHAT THE FUC K KIND OF QUESTION IS THIS? dang you completly rewrote history and are asking us how to handle it? if you had said, what happened it hitler took over russia, or somthing, then people might be able to answer.
you wrote, lets say this happened this way but they didnt know and then these guys saw those dues doing this but at this time and then they suddenly are so strong that they controlled mars and then the earth split in two, who would be alive?
2007-10-20 12:16:22 · answer #6 · answered by Para-diddle 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
America would win support by our technological edge, and our availability of raw materail- copper, steel, wood.
2007-10-20 12:50:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, Stalin would have never 'captured' Ethiopia. That's one 'if' that you can drop.
2007-10-22 19:06:43 · answer #8 · answered by Ethio In Ethio AND PROUD ! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's a big difference between computer games and reality.
2007-10-20 12:15:13 · answer #9 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋