which one is the best in your opinion?
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc302/agberry89/?action=view¤t=alexspictures001.jpg
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc302/agberry89/?action=view¤t=alexspictures007.jpg
http://s212.photobucket.com/albums/cc302/agberry89/?action=view¤t=alexspictures008.jpg
2007-10-20 10:37:16 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Photography
I don't think they're bad.
I thought the first one was kinda cool, with the unfocused bg and sharp flower bud thing.
Yeah! The third one has a nice mood.
Keep shooting! Everyone has potential-- thats why I gave antoni a bad rating. I wish I could take it back, though, because the rest he said is true...
And, like other answerers said, aim for getting more of a "pop" in your b/w pictures.
Have a nice day...
2007-10-20 22:38:21 · answer #1 · answered by Mary 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you want to be a good photographer, then you have potential. As for these photos, the flower is overexposed and out of focus.
The tent is a rather boring composition, and the B&W conversion is not good at all, totally lacking pop and contrast. The lighting was unremarkable to start with, so no depth. The street scene also is not a good conversion due to flat lighting. Keep practicing and learning. If you haven't already, get some books on beginning photography and take some classes if possible. Being a good photographer is not out of reach for anyone who wants to learn it. Most people aren't born with a thorough understanding of composition and aperture! So have at it and best wishes!
2007-10-20 16:57:10 · answer #2 · answered by Ara57 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The first picture was a little out of focus.
And the second and third looked a little boring.
If you're going to do black and white pictures, try to get a little more contrast so that they aren't as dull.
Also, the subjects in the pictures weren't that interesting either.
It's a good start for sure, and you're pretty brave to put your work out to be evaluated. You should definitely stick to it, and devote every moment you can to taking new pictures, and experimenting with techniques.
If its something you really love doing and you do it a lot, then you would be a great photographer.
2007-10-20 11:24:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Hate to burst your bubble but...
pic 1. (001)
Out of focus, over exposed, lacks any merit as a photograph to be taken seriously. Not even worthy of the term 'happy snap'.
pic2 (alex007)
Fair composition given the limitations of your camera. Image is however soft and low contrast, mostly due to the lighting. Would be far better if shot in either the early morning or late afternoon.
pic 3 (alex008)
Again washed out black and white, low contrast and soft image, pretty much a typical 'happy snap'.
Now for the not so bad news. Depending on how old you are you may have the potential to produce good work with a lot of practice and study.
Adding extra information such as your age to the info above and how long you've been taking photographs will better help me give you better advice.
2007-10-20 10:57:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Where was the 3rd picture taken? It reminds me of a place in Kansas.
Anyway, the black and white images lack contrast. You see, in color photography, objects are discerned by their color, among other things, but mostly their color. In B&W photography, the only thing that seperates objects are their contrast. The key to this is to remember: no contrast is bad, little contrast is bad, too much contrast is bad. You as a photographer is to find the middle ground.
2007-10-20 11:46:18 · answer #5 · answered by electrosmack1 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'll join the list of professional photographers and be the first to say that TOO MUCH profession isn't always a good thing. I don't like to nic pic a photo to death so I can make myself sound real good. Learn NOW my dear that you will not please everyone. How do YOU feel about the pictures? How do they move You? Sometimes I think to much education extracts the pure love of photography right out of us. We don't Look at the picture,,,,we analize it. In keeping it simple so you can keep loving what you do,,,,,,,,let the heart lead.
2007-10-20 12:44:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
1
2017-02-10 06:07:12 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Capture the flowers must using closeup lens or telephoto at 75-300mm lens,or using vertical cropping to make less background for an image ,second and third photos were without white colour ,only grey and black colour,I think photo printer didn't control the right colour for your photos
2007-10-20 18:45:45 · answer #8 · answered by victor98_2001 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't like any of them...there is no point or no art to the picture. Looks like a kid had fun with a camera and with the edit of black and white.
The crop and angel of the picture is wide and very poor shooting.
I m sorry I just don't like any of them
2007-10-20 12:09:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
One excellent photographer believed that a camera and cameraman "holds light" in photographing. Those pictures which "hold more light" are better. (Light can include Light of Soul.)
"Creation: Artistic and Spiritual," Omraam Mikhael Aivanhov, is a good general book on creativity. In paperback. And, "Watch Your Dreams," Ann Ree Colton, is good for image/symbol discussion.
"Liked them all."
regards,
j.
2007-10-20 10:59:56 · answer #10 · answered by j153e 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋