Do you think that the mathamatical probabilities?

Question

of man evolving from a primordial soup by method of the "big bang theroy" is equal to a tornado going through a junk yard and building a perfectly functional boeing 747?? All the materials are there all you need is a catalyst or at least this is what many evolutionist want us to believe.

To those who speak of multiple tornadoes how many big bangs did we have?

Answer 1

What makes less sense than a tornado going through a junkyard and building a 747 is the fact that there are some individuals that add to this the probability of other tornados coming through the same junkyard and instead of destroying the work of the former tornado (as tornados actually do), the latter ones will come and add work to finish the aircraft. Hello, is there a thinking mind in the group???

As for science proving evolution, the very laws of physics disprove that evolution could ever be a probability to the entire creation process. (want something to read?? Read the complete works of Darwin, The Father of Evolution, who himself could NOT prove that his theory was anything more than what it is, a theory).

A tornado is a chaotic event that twists and mangles, tossing objects in all directions. No, there is no mathematical formula that would satisfy an equation like that.

Answer 2

This is an argument for a lack of knowledge and incredulity. Given 1 tornado yes it seems highly unlikely, but if you multiply the tornado many times then it significantly increases the chances. Now suppose that the tornado had a natural tendency to assemble things, you get an even bigger chance.

The point is unless you are dealing with the actual components, their properties and the amounts present you can not know the actual probablility nor can you realistically or meaningfully compare it to a tornado.

Edit:
by the way, we have found naturally occuring RNA like structures, this inceases the probability even more.

Answer 3

The 747 argument is pure garbage, since 747s don't replicate themselves.

If one molecule gains the ability to catalyze the formation of similar molecules, thenn eventually, it is likely to catalyze the formation of another with that property. Now there are two molecules that will eventually produce a better molecule of a different molecule. One somewhat reliable replication is achieved (producing at least one functional molecule in the time the molecules decay), the road to life is set.

Tornadoes have to much energy and last a short time. A "gentle simmer" for hundreds of millions of years does nicely.

Answer 4

Its more FAR more unlikely than the boeing 747 being created by junk...

That's IF its blind chance though!

That's not what evolution says AT ALL.

Creationists love throwing in the 'big bang theory' even though it has less than nothing to do with evolution because the notion of some huge explosion - which isn't what the inflationary model is about anyway - has connotations of destruction.

I'd explain but you're really not interested, are you? Stick your head in the sand, ignorance suits you.

Answer 5

as creationists are sometimes fond of pointing out, we don't have any solid ideas about what happened at the origin of life. but there is no reason to suppose that it happened as creationists demand, with the chance assembly of a fully functional cell (let alone a human being, as you would have it)! there are far better ideas than that - RNA world for instance. evidence, such as it is, indicates that life appeared within a few hundred million years of conditions becoming favorable. this seems to be more than enough time for any one of the scenarios so far proposed, or some as yet undiscovered scenario, to have occurred.

also you may not have noticed, but in that example the tornado itself is a system that creationists say cannot occur - order from chaos. it takes in energy and puts out entropy, so of course its surroundings become disordered - but in so doing, the tornado persists. life is a bit like that. of course, tornadoes don't reproduce or evolve so the analogy only goes so far, but one may imagine a chemical system analogous to a tornado, a protocell, acquiring the ability to reproduce by incorporating a hereditary system such as RNA/DNA.

Answer 6

I think that God made the universe with help of science-so yes ,if you look better to the both sides of the problem,if God wanted - the universe could rise from "big bang". Is no real the contradiction between since and religion, only the religious people who can't understand since and the science men who can't uderstand religion say that is not possible.

Answer 7

Not one single person I have met who believes in evolution thinks that. Evolution happens slowly step by step, not just pop up (like in creationism).

Your logic thinking seems to be like this: "A tornado can't build a Boeng 747, and my grandpa wasn't a monkey, the only logical conclusion is that my local religion must be right". That is called a false dilemma.

Answer 8

No, I don't.

If you posed the question as millions upon billions of tornadoes going through millions upon billions of junkyards millions upon billions of times, some simultaneously and some sequentially, with those millions upon billions of times building a piece of metal which then was built upon by the next tornado and so on ad infinitum, THEN the statement would more accurately reflect reality.

Answer 9

Well the comparison is not correct.The big bang theory is about how the universe started,evolution is about how life changed through natural selection to produce the diversity of life we see on Earth

Answer 10

Not sure of the "mathamatical" probabilities, but I'm certain that God can do anything...including having man evolve from a primordial soup.

Yaks(pbuh)