http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa003&articleID=000E9965-99A6-13FB-99A683414B7F0000
2007-10-20 01:33:05 · 13 answers · asked by Y!A-FOOL 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Oh come on, can't you people ever agree on anything.
I swear that getting straight answers here is like pulling teeth!
2007-10-20 01:42:02 · update #1
If I missed giving anybody a thumbs up have your people talk to my people about it.
2007-10-20 01:51:11 · update #2
Actually Jweston I see no reason for the ideas of evolution to actually deal with God at all, you are right to point out that I used creation as a sloppy reference to Creationist who base their beliefs in Genesis.
I wish I could give you two thumbs up for raising that point, even if I do disagree with the isea of assuming a God did the creation thing instead of a simple "Don't know"
2007-10-20 02:14:25 · update #3
This is going to the voters. I am not going to choose the best answer because I liked them all, even the ones I did not like.
Thanks to all of you, I hope you all get chosen as best answer.
2007-10-20 06:56:22 · update #4
evolution.
2007-10-20 01:36:18 · answer #1 · answered by Helen Scott 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
The answers are so biased towards "evolution" it's almost funny. The question is also ridiculous: the issue isn't evolution versus creation but evolution versus Genesis. Even evolutionists must logically admit to a creator God, that is if they want to be logical.
2007-10-20 01:54:35 · answer #2 · answered by w2 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
A chicken is a bird. There is evidence that birds evolved from dinosaurs and dinosaurs had teeth. An embryo passes through several stages in which it doesn't look like the being it actually is when fully developed. Sounds like evolution to me. I know a Lutheran who would say that god did it. He doesn't believe in any science.
2007-10-20 01:43:35 · answer #3 · answered by Lionheart ® 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Definitely evolution.
2007-10-20 01:39:01 · answer #4 · answered by Blue 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It must mean that chickens and dinosaurs are the same 'kind'.
2007-10-20 01:48:23 · answer #5 · answered by Doc Occam 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is not proof. Evolution can only be falsified - not proven. It is merely evidence in support of evolution.
2007-10-20 01:41:04 · answer #6 · answered by rachelesse 3 · 7⤊ 1⤋
one point for evolution theory
2007-10-20 01:43:42 · answer #7 · answered by I'm an Atheist 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
interesting.
its evolution clearly.
2007-10-20 01:39:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
mutations evolve........birthing creates
2007-10-20 01:44:38 · answer #9 · answered by cliffordw hippiefied ol fart 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
everything is proves of creation, science is just PAINFULLY slow to learn.....
2007-10-20 01:40:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
evolution, even in the article it says "mutant", does "god" "create" mutants?Because that would imply he isn't perfect (or isn't paying attention....)
from what I've seen on Yahoo answers I'm beginning to think "scientific american" must be an oxymoron...
2007-10-20 01:38:48 · answer #11 · answered by 地獄 6 · 6⤊ 1⤋