English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Here's lookin' at you, Jack P.

http://cyberevolution.info/uploads/vessel.jpg

Well, if I hadn't blocked you, I mean....

2007-10-19 14:05:38 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

(((bettie, AEC and Mrs. Avatard)))

Very good to see you again, Mrs. Avi!

2007-10-19 14:10:50 · update #1

Lol, Maya :)

2007-10-19 14:12:23 · update #2

19 answers

I never denigrate atheists. Some of my best dinosaurs are atheists.

2007-10-19 14:34:53 · answer #1 · answered by Lady Morgana 7 · 4 0

the assumption of parallel universes comes from 2 places. the 1st is a mathematical technique used to remedy perturbation theory calculations in quantum mechanics of "summing over all attainable worlds". some attempt to truly interpret this as meaning one and all of those attainable worlds exist. even however, they do no longer upward push up in non-perturbative remedies, so as that they are extra wisely considered mathematical artefacts. the 2nd is from good theory. right here strings have been generalised to planes talked approximately as branes, and those enable for extra universes than our very own. Their is not any information, and the math is esoteric - as quickly as back they might jsut be a mathematical artefact. even however, the opportunity of distinctive universes appeals to a pair by way of obvious effective tuning of the universe. If the regulations of nature have been in basic terms a sprint diverse then existence ought to no longer exist in it. the reason of this might in simple terms be that the regulations are fastened in a mathematical way we have not yet unearthed. even however, the universe might have cycled by using many lives, maximum of that have been volatile or did no longer help existence.

2016-12-15 04:19:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know, I got so many people blocked , it's a crying shame, because truly, I would like to know what they think without running the risk of the "Oops" message from yahoo.

2007-10-19 14:14:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

I've found most of the denigration to be originating from the proclaimed atheists. I don't have any real religious beliefs and consider myself to be somewhat of an agnostic. However, I was raised to respect the beliefs of others, something that seems to have alluded the atheists.

2007-10-19 14:12:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Well, yeah, but there's plenty of atheists that do the same to anyone who mentions that they believe in a god.

Y'all are sad, both sides who do that. Have a debate, not a contest about who can have the most disdain for the other side. Share information and points of view instead of sharpening your vocab of hating words.

2007-10-19 14:10:33 · answer #5 · answered by Sarah 5 · 2 3

To 'racist answer man? I feel the same way about those stupid pathetic republican neo cons! So there!!!!
I don't pay attention to atheist detractors!
They're not that important!

2007-10-19 15:14:25 · answer #6 · answered by evictus 3 · 1 0

Yeah, there are. Who's that one whose response is always a 2 page paste of scripture but no answer to the question?

2007-10-19 14:10:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I don't. I would feel comfortable denigrating your avatar,however. I don't mind that you choose to be a dinosaur but people who go around with their mouths hanging open do present negatively.

2007-10-19 14:09:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

I don't really know the answer to that and maybe you should just ignore any stupidity on here. That usually works for me.

2007-10-19 14:08:57 · answer #9 · answered by MISS-MARY 6 · 4 0

No I don't the few questions I have asked even if I didn't care for the answer I thumbs up.

2007-10-19 14:12:30 · answer #10 · answered by Ice 4 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers