English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

32 answers

No, there is no evidence except for the evidence you can see, but then nobody cares.

2007-10-19 12:41:52 · answer #1 · answered by . 3 · 1 2

From what I read of it, it's kind of hard to get any timeline from the Bible. The Jews have kept a kind of history that reaches back some 6,000 years, but it's pretty loose history. And just how is the time measured between Adam & Eve to the beginning of Jewish history?

In fact, I just read in Genesis 1:27 that God created Man in his own image, and it included the males and the females, on the 6th Day.

Yet, it's not until Genesis 2:4 that Adam comes along, and then in Genesis 2:21 that Eve came along. And as a result, in Genesis 2:27, it admonishes that a man must LEAVE his mother and father to take a wife.

If Adam & Eve were the first man and woman, what mothers and fathers does Genesis 2:27 speak of? In other words, how many thousands or millions of years elapsed between the 6th Day and the story of Adam & Eve?

Only the Bible Bangers (!) consider it to be a literal truth with no room for variation. Now here's a question to ask: If Adam was the first man, did he have a penis before Eve was made, and if so, WHY?

*Oh, geez, now THERE is 'proof'. If we, who had never been there, GUESSED at how much dust, only to be found out wrong, it does not change the age of the moon. This carries about as much weight as the one about scientists discovering a missing day in the universe which supports the Bible account of the Sun standing still. There is no master cosmic clock available to scientists to determine how many days there have been in the history of the universe.

2007-10-19 13:02:03 · answer #2 · answered by Marc X 6 · 0 1

Saying the world is only 6 or 7 thousand years old is a futile attempt of the bible bangers to debunk science and promote creation per book of Genesis. So it's denial , I guess.

2007-10-19 13:55:06 · answer #3 · answered by Bookworm 6 · 0 0

None.
Yes.

"The Ussher chronology is a 17th-century chronology of the history of the world formulated from an interpretative reading of the Bible by James Ussher, the Anglican Archbishop of Armagh (in what is now Northern Ireland). The chronology is sometimes associated with Young Earth Creationism, that holds that the universe was created only a few millennia ago."

2007-10-19 12:55:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Tons of proof , Get Kent Hovind's creation seminar series . One of the seminars gives many indisputable proofs . Here are a few. Moon dust, Prior to landing on the moon scientists thought that there would be about 6 feet of space dust on the moon since it was thought to be billions of years old. When we landed there in 1969 turns out that there was only an inch or two . If the world is billions of years old you would expect much more and bigger deserts . the Sahara desert is just right for 4000 years of desertification since the flood. This coincides with the Biblical creation story that the earth was created about 6000 years ago, and about 4000 years ago there was a flood. There is a multitude of evidence for creation . Preconcieved atheistic and darwinistic assumptions blind many today from the simple evidence so plainly left by God of the worldwide flood. In fact 2000 years ago the Bible prophesied that those who mock the creation and flood accounts would do so.

2 Peter 3:3-6 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:

Dont fall for the billons of year scam. Come to Christ!

2007-10-19 12:58:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

No, the world is not 6 to 7 thousand years old. It is approximately 6 billion years old. And besides, if the world was only 6 thousands year old, where would the million year old Dinosaur bones come from?

2007-10-23 11:41:55 · answer #6 · answered by Soccer Hooligan 4 · 0 1

Yes see them here:

http://www.creationevidence.org/scientific_evid/evidencefor/evidencefor.html

1. The Fossil Record
2. Decay of Earth's Magnetic Field
3. The Global Flood
4. Population Statistics
5. Radio Halos
6. Human Artifacts throughout the Geologic Column
7. Helium Content in Earth's Atmosphere
8. Expansion of Space Fabric
9. Design in Living Systems
10. Design in the Human Brain

<><

2007-10-19 12:48:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

yes there is but you might have to study geology longer andharderthan most geologists ever do to be able to see past the lies to the real evidence. Start with the sediment from the flood, covering everything, then learn how carbin dating is terribly flawed, then consider that GOD made light stretching from stars to here all in the same instant. If you really care care about the truth, not just seeing what you want to see you will not draw conclusions until there is simply NO possibility left that your conclusions are incorrect. few scientists are that dedicated, most have a bias and an agenda that means mote to them then certainty.

2007-10-19 12:46:38 · answer #8 · answered by ecd1975 2 · 4 1

1.The almost complete absence of evidence of erosion or soil layers or the activity of living things (plant roots, burrow marks, etc.) at the upper surface of the various strata (showing that the stratum did not lay there for thousands or millions of years before the next layer was deposited).

2.Polystrate fossils (usually trees) that cut through more than one layer of rock (even different kinds of rock supposedly deposited over thousands if not millions of years). The trees would have rotted and left no fossil evidence if the deposition rate was that slow.

3.Soft-sediment deformation—that thousands of feet of sedimentary rocks (of various layers) are bent (like a stack of thin pancakes over the edge of a plate), as we see at the mile-deep Kaibab Upwarp in the Grand Canyon. Clearly the whole, mile-deep deposit of various kinds of sediment was still relatively soft and probably wet (not like it is today) when the earthquake occurred that uplifted one part of the series of strata.

4. Many fossils that show (require) very rapid burial and fossilization. For example, soft parts (jellyfish, animal feces, scales and fins of fish) or whole, large, fully-articulated skeletons (e.g., whales or large dinosaurs such as T-Rex) are preserved. Or we find many creatures’ bodies contorted. All this evidence shows that these creatures were buried rapidly (in many cases even buried alive) and fossilized before scavengers, micro-decay organisms and erosional processes could erase the evidence. These are found all over the world and all through the various strata.

5. The rock record screaming “Noah’s Flood” and “young earth.” The secular geologists can’t hear or see the message because of their academic indoctrination in anti-biblical, naturalistic, uniformitarian assumptions. The reason that most Christian geologists can’t see it is the same, plus the fact that they have believed the scientific establishment more than the Bible that they claim to believe is the inspired, inerrant Word of God. There are also thoroughly researched scientific refutations of skeptical objections to Noah’s Ark and the Flood, which strengthen one’s faith in the biblical account of the Flood.

This is by no means all the evidence, but it is enough to question the old age belief.

2007-10-19 12:50:04 · answer #9 · answered by BrotherMichael 6 · 2 2

I believe in God But there is no Chance The World is Only 6 to 7 thousand year old. As a matter of fact Dinosaurs died 65 million years ago. The Rock testing another one was referring roughly makes the world billions of year old.

2007-10-19 12:46:11 · answer #10 · answered by Vidocq 6 · 1 4

On the contrary, the age of the Earth has been measured at 4.55 billion years (give or take half an hour or so).

Age of rocks is measured by radiometric dating techniques. We know these are reliable because multiple *independent* methods all give ages which agree with each other. If there was any major flaw in the principles upon which radiometric dating is based, the results would not agree. Moreover, they also agree with other, non-radiometric dating methods.

The oldest rocks found in situ on Earth are nearly 4 billion years old. The oldest rocks ever dated are meteorites, which were formed at the same time as the Earth, and they give an age of 4.55 billion years, so the Earth must also be around that age.

2007-10-19 12:42:50 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

fedest.com, questions and answers