Should native born citizens born of non native parents be stripped of US citizenship?

Question

I ask this for kicks and giggles..

so let a baby pay for parents mistake ?

Dream ??? Do Martin Luther King a favor and remove his picture from you answers. He would roll in his grave if he read your response, you really think MLK would be for punishing any child for his / hers parents act??? WOW

gomanyes : what about African Americasn are they not natives ??? what I mean by not native is they are not American and possibly Illegal

Answer 1

Only native American Indians under this plan are citizens. As none of our ancestors were born here, we are, there fore illegal under this concept. Fair is fair if you think this is correct, then you too should leave. This is the same old fertilizer the far incorrect brings up all of the time. But they want to be the exception

Answer 2

Yes, the reason why is for moral reasons. We need to destroy the mechanism that allows some one to take advantage of, or use their children for leverage.

It could be possible to have different provisions, such as a grandfather clause, for children that are already citizens,or the possibility of a speedy immigration policey incases where one parent is a citizen. The problem is, that there will always be people trying to exploit the system, and children for their own goals, while there are honest people just trying to make a family.

In most other countries, just because you were born in the country does not make you a citizen.


Deport illegals, and keep the dream alive.

Answer 3

Only if the parents are here illegally. If they are both in this nation legally, then I have no problem with this.

As for the baby paying for the "parents' mistake" - a "mistake" is doing something in error; not knowingly. You honestly can't tell me that the illegal immigrants in this nation don't know they are here illegally. They know, and they don't care. So I don't think they should benefit in any way for their illegal actions. Criminals aren't allowed to profit from their crimes in this nation. THAT IS THE LAW - as is filing the proper papers and paying the fees to get into this nation legally.

Answer 4

If those non-native parents were residing in the U.S. illegally, then yes. The parents are in the country illegally, therefore their child is here illegally as well. Why should someone who is in a country illegally expect to be considered a citizen of that country?

Answer 5

If you are truly looking for the real answer here it is:

Birthright citizenship is a myth. It never really existed. The 14th amendment specifically denies it.
Most un-informed people will point to the following phrase
as justification for birthright citizenship:

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."

Under the current (wrong) interpretation, the words "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" are superfluous. One can either assume that the architects of this phrase just wanted to throw in some extra, un-needed words or one could ask what they meant by the phrase.

The intent of the framers is express and clear, as recorded in the May 30, 1866 edition of the Congressional Globe. Senator Jacob Howard, author of the clause, said, "This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers ...".

Senator Lyman Trumbull, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, elaborated:

"What do we mean by 'subject to the jurisdiction' of the United States? Not owing allegiance to anyone else. That is what it means ... It cannot be said of any (one) who owes allegiance ... to some other government that he is 'subject' to the jurisdiction of the United States."

Five critical words here proscribe automatic citizenship - "...subject to the jurisdiction thereof...". Those who enter illegally, in other words, not under the aegis of the United States government, are therefore not under its jurisdiction.

The "automatic" citizenship conferred on children of illegal aliens is in defiance and contempt of both the intent of the framers and the understanding of the framers' intent by those who voted to ratify it.

You cannot strip someone of something they never legally had. All you can do is correct the mistake of giving them something they did not deserve.

Probably not the answer you were looking for but the answer you asked for nontheless.

Answer 6

NO! Although the parents may have come here to have a baby just to be able to stay, doesnt mean that they actually really wanted the baby to have a better life. In my state illegals and non-citizens aren't eligible for DSHS or medical, so... Anyway, it's not the childs fault that their parents came here and are not citizens, forcing ANY child from their home and country is/would be very traumatic.

Answer 7

There are sufficient helping records to the U.S. shape and ratification thereof that are crystal sparkling. Hamilton replaced into - for solid reason - being singled out as ineligible to run for president. He replaced into born in the East Indies to persons community to the colonies. considering that he wasn't born on U.S. soil, he replaced into no longer seen a "organic born citizen". that's the alternative of the court docket (a minimum of it replaced into for the 1st a hundred and fifty years, or so) as to eligibility. till an modification says otherwise (and, no, the 14th would not contradict this) it keeps to be regulation. The 14th modification replaced into and is obvious touching directly to its foundation in "organic regulation", that the hot-born is under the comparable jurisdiction as his/her mothers and dads. If an unlawful alien supplies delivery on U.S. soil, the regulation does N O T immediately grant citizenship to that new child. study the thirty 9th Congressional Globe, particularly those statements on the Senate floor via Andrew Johnson, Jacob Howard and Lyman Trumball. ...

Answer 8

Citizenship should not be taken from those who are already citizens. However, going forward, the law should be changed to reflect that in order to be a natural born citizen, at least one of your parents has to be an american citizen.

Answer 9

Yes they should all be deported.

They are being used as a weapon to destroy the middle class of the USA, in order for the Globalist Elites Scum Traitors hiding behind the Council of Foreign Relations and Financed by Rockefeller and Rothschilds (owners of the Corrupt FEDERAL RESERVE) to implement their North American Union and subsequently New World Order Tyranny.

Answer 10

I wonder how many of you people that answered this question accually pay taxes and dont get a return at the end of the year.

Next, the people that say ship them out, probably are middle class blue collar workers that support nation building by war and genocide, you know the war in Iraq ....

I have an issue with the legality of the parents of the anchor baby citizenship, none the less we should be proactive about it. When they go to have the children, no papers ... deport them immediately after they have the child.

They can fill out their birth certificate in the country of their origin, meaning hand it to them when they get of the plane, bus or ambulance. This can be done & done humanely.

Dont race bait either, we have illegal immigrants of all nationalities in this country. I'm sick of all this hispanic, mexican bashing in here. Most of the people that do that are too lame to take some of the jobs the Illegals take and are too lazy to do anything but complain about it.