Why or Why not?
2007-10-19 05:17:27 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Stability is what is wanted. As long as there isn't a full-blown war I don't think the US will intervene in any significant way.
2007-10-19 05:21:49 · answer #1 · answered by Dharma Nature 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have been given so a ways as "usa conflict Leaders" and stop examining. What source is that? Who talks like that? As for the alleged NUCLEAR attack, you should comprehend we gained't have self belief a topic we pay attention from any media source. you may do basically besides firing up the fast wave radio and hear that on your information. we are no longer likely to attack anybody with nukes. despite if Israel takes out Iranian bomb factories, they'll use commonplace hands. ok, I examine greater. A planned collapsing of the western banking device as potential of destroying the Russian financial device? No no no, you have have been given all of it incorrect. The fall down of the dollar is being engineered by using speedy inflation so as topersistent human beings into accepting the Amero and the North American Union. It has no longer something to do with Russia. Get your info straight away guy! :-)
2016-10-13 04:39:36 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what Iran might do in the next 5 years; if they try to impose their kind of religious extremism on the middle east then there could be a chance of them being attacked by the free world.
2007-10-19 05:23:50 · answer #3 · answered by Optimist E 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that we will be allies with Iran within five years. Our purpose in the Middle East is to liberate the people, not come against them.
My son was in Iraq three years ago as an Army MP. The common people loves the U.S. military, because they know that we are there for them It is not the countries that we are coming against. Al Qaeda is the enemy.
2007-10-19 05:30:07 · answer #4 · answered by Caveman 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
April 2008.
2007-10-19 05:32:54 · answer #5 · answered by gone 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no but the united states will probably attack the united states by 2008, right about the time of the elections
2007-10-19 05:20:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes, the public reason will be because of the threat that their leader and a nuclear weapon would bring to the world. a man with that amount of power that admit-tingly wants to wipe a race of the face of the earth should not be allowed. this would be a valid reason for the conflict.
government reason will be to try and establish a "better" democracy in that country to bring western control and stability to the middle east for the resource capabilities. Not a valid reason.
2007-10-19 05:24:13 · answer #7 · answered by irish398 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. They will attack us directly, or Israel first.
Actually, they are already at war with us, having trained terrorists in Iran, shipped them into Iraq, and supplied arms and advisors into Iraq.
If you haven't read the real news, you haven't heard any of this.
2007-10-19 05:25:22 · answer #8 · answered by zeal4him 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if Isreal does not do it first.
Why ?
They have vowed to Destroy the United States and Isreal, (especially Isreal).
If they come into possession of a Nuke, I have no doubts that they will smuggle it into the trunk of a Car , park it in downtown New York and set it off.
2007-10-19 05:22:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am afraid George W. Bush might attack before he term ends. But Congress will not permit him to do so. I don't think that Democratics will favor attacking Iran.
2007-10-19 05:22:22 · answer #10 · answered by majeed3245 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes i do, because they are in cohoots with bin laden and until the either give him up or help us catch him they have a huge and undenyable target on their back, and also the nuclear power they are stock piling is scary and if we dont strike first they will and do more damage that we can ever dream...
2007-10-19 05:31:29 · answer #11 · answered by THE UK WILDCAT FAMILY 10 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋