Yes, typically in trace amounts.
Interestingly, trace quantities of blood are also quite common in milk and meat, even when they have been conscientiously processed according to modern methods. Thus, the conscience of a sincere Christian may move him to choose a vegetarian diet (or to refuse an organ transplant).
Of course, the bible plainly authorizes meat-eating. Thus, another Christian might reason that such trace amounts are tolerated by Jehovah God.
(Genesis 9:3-4) Every moving animal that is alive may serve as food for you. ...I do give it all to you [Noah and your descendants]. Only flesh with its soul—its blood—you must not eat.
(James 4:17) If one knows how to do what is right and yet does not do it, it is a sin for him.
(Acts 15:20,28,29) Write them [the various Christian congregations] to abstain from things polluted by idols [the meat of which is likely to contain blood] and from fornication and from what is strangled [the meat of which is likely to contain blood] and from blood. ...For the holy spirit and we ourselves have favored adding no further burden to you, except these necessary things, to keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols [the meat of which is likely to contain blood] and from blood and from things strangled [the meat of which is likely to contain blood] and from fornication. If you carefully keep yourselves from these things, you will prosper.
Learn more:
http://watchtower.org/e/hb/index.htm?article=article_07.htm
http://watchtower.org/e/vcnb/article_01.htm
2007-10-19 17:55:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by achtung_heiss 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Actually get up and pull your head from your a$$... They have NOT stated so and feature NOT confirmed so. I have visible this 1000s of occasions earlier than! It is simply Pro-Life Nazism rearing it is unpleasant head once more... What you SHOULD do is sign up for the publication from NARAL and be trained the truly fact and the reality approximately the evangelicals and white apartment's wish to drive their legislation at the Women of America! Either that or take a enormous step BACKWARDS and become a member of Randall Terry and his Operation Rescue stormtroopers..simply so we will be able to restrict/protest you extra effectively.
2016-09-05 15:15:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by vanterpool 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I read somewhere in Wt.Soc literature a long time ago the wonderful phrase, 'extra-vascular fluid' which apparently covers a multitude of sins. It looks like watered down blood, but it's not blood, actually, according to the Wt.Soc. But their definition of blood is a fluid thing (pun intended). It's not blood when you ingest all and any blood fractions separately, but it is blood when you ingest them together. There are NO simple answers to JW blood questions, I'm afraid.
2007-10-20 01:03:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
yes there will always be a residual amount of blood, not only in the blood vessels but actually in the tissue itself
2007-10-19 04:17:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by LUCY M 2
·
4⤊
0⤋
Couldn't possably be, because the Governing body says that you can not have any body elses blood put into your body!
If the Witnesses do not see the blind devotion to man in this one issue, it is hopeless and the only thing we can do is to warn those who are watching on the outside.
2007-10-19 17:06:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Another unnecessary and invalid load of rubbish to put upon JWs. Poor devils.
2007-10-19 04:20:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by cheir 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
yes
2007-10-19 04:16:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
man, they are so hyprocritical for allowing organ transplants
2007-10-19 09:26:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by ~testube Jebus~ 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Yes.
The capillaries are ... oh dammit, you said no sermons which I suppose include lectures. Oh well.
2007-10-19 04:29:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Equinox 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Why, of course :)
2007-10-19 04:32:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Nea 5
·
2⤊
0⤋