English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Really, I believe homosexual activity is a sin, but I cannot figure out why we point to Leviticus, because then it makes us look like we are picking and choosing what is a sin because Leviticus condemms so much activity.

2007-10-19 03:03:13 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

13 answers

Only if you still condemn people for eating shellfish, pork, four legged fowl, etc. You also must still stone people for working on Sunday and kill your disobedient children if you are going to use Old Testament laws to condemn homosexuality.

2007-10-19 03:10:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

I think you are right but from a slightly different angle. I think all the fact that it is mentioned in Leviticus proves is that they had a big enough gay population that they felt the need to make up some laws about it.
Oddly enough, all through history the percentage of gays has remained almost constant. Under oppression they are less open about it, under liberalism they are more open about it but the actual numbers never seem to change.

Yes, singling out the gays when there are so many other sins available does look a bit funny. You guys should be rejecting toilets and travelling outside city limits with your shovels every time you need to go poop. God gets real upset when people do not bury their poop and he happens to step in it. The bible is quite clear on that point.

Oh, my perspective is as an atheist.

2007-10-19 03:18:30 · answer #2 · answered by Y!A-FOOL 5 · 1 0

Condiering that Gays are born they way they are, and it is not a life style that they CHOOSE1 The fact IS, that they are HERE, and they are not going anywhere!
The fact that christrians condemn the Gays, doesn't particularly bother them either! It wouldn't me,if I were Gay! The fact that they are 'wired'' differently, than heterosexuals are, doesn't mean that they do not enjoy, or want sex, the same way we do! Would we go without sex, if suddenly, it were not the norm for hetersexuals, to have sex? I don't even think so!
So why not mind your own business, about what people do in their bedrooms! I really doubt if all of you good christians, would tolerate someone coming into YOUR bedrooms, and stand over your shoulders, telling you what you can or can not do!
It is the same principle!
I agree with the other answerer! There are many other things you should be concerned about!
Hunger, and homelessness, crime, WAR! Pick up the newspaper, and choose something!
Leave the Gays alone, and find a new cause!

2007-10-19 03:53:33 · answer #3 · answered by evictus 3 · 0 1

Correct. Using the Leviticus holiness code to condemn homosexuality is hypocritical if you don't also follow the laws about eating shellfish, squaring your beard, stoning your disobedient children, etc.

Romans 1, though, is just silly. Paul is having a dummy spit about Roman Christians who want to retain pagan customs (the letter is obviously a reply to one that posed this question) and he's saying God will punish them by making them gay. Read it for yourself.

Do you actually have any good rational reasons for thinking homosexuality is immoral, or are you just parroting what you've been taught?

2007-10-19 03:18:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I usually point to the New Testament and 1 Corinthians 6:9-11
"Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual, nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God."

It not only shows that homosexuality is a sin, but that it is a sin on the same level as all the other things listed. And just like them, is a sin from which a person can be washed, separated (the meaning of santified) and freed from repeating (the meaning of justified).

2007-10-19 03:18:31 · answer #5 · answered by dewcoons 7 · 0 1

The Levitical regulation become given to the Jews to split themselves from something of the international. Many Christians trust that this "covenant" in basic terms applies for the olden day Hebrews, because of this verse. “yet our extreme Priest [Jesus Christ] has been given a ministry it really is a few distance more suitable to the ministry of those who serve less than the former rules, for he's the fellow who guarantees for us a more suitable ideal covenant with God, in accordance to bigger ideal aspects." ~(Heb. 8:6) Now that Jesus got here and died for us, a sparkling covenant become shaped. so some distance as Christians condemning homosexuality on the on the spot there is a million Cor 6:9-10 "9 Or do you no longer comprehend that wrongdoers received't inherit the dominion of God? do no longer be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor adult adult males who've sex with adult adult males[a] 10 nor thieves nor the grasping nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the dominion of God." So, briefly, in case you do not trust contained in the Bible because the know God, then i assume there is no situation with homosexuality. yet when Christians trust that homosexuality isn't incorrect it really is the position the challenge lies. for my section, if you're gay, and also you aren't any more a Christian i do no longer hate you, i do no longer condemn you and also you're in basic terms someone like another. yet in case you declare to be Christian, and are gay, you're ignoring the Bible which says outright "received't inherit the dominion of Heaven". Homosexuality is in basic terms as incorrect as thievery, yet incorrect all a similar (From a Biblical factor of view)

2016-10-21 10:07:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Point to Leviticus, then back it up with the references in the Christian Greek Scriptures (NT)... the consistency will show that it is still something that God does not approve of.

(You may also want to include the last blatant activity of the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah before they were destroyed - remember that the men of the cities nearly knocked down Lot's door in order to fornicate with Lot's male visitors)

2007-10-19 03:27:56 · answer #7 · answered by DwayneWayne 4 · 0 1

Not so much as pointless as simply redundant. It is pointed out in many verses in the bible. The thing is when you pointit out you have to remember topoint out that ALL sin is considered a sin and that homosexuality does not separate one from God any more than lying or cheating does. You also have to note that none of us are supposed to judge them or condemn them for their lifestyle as ours is no more holy than theirs.

2007-10-19 03:10:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

The only person who could be taken seriously while referring to Leviticus is someone who adhered to all the rules in Leviticus.

2007-10-19 03:07:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Romans 1 is a better place to point

2007-10-19 03:09:44 · answer #10 · answered by Chris 4 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers