English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you still believe that this war on terra is
genuine, and Al Qaeda was behind 9/11
then watch these interviews of Hollywood
producer Aaron Russo, who was a close
friend of one of the elites, Nick
Rockefeller. Aaron was told by Nick
Rockefeller, about 11 months before
9/11, that there would be an "event" that
would lead to the attacks on Afghanistan
and Iraq, and that they would all be
chasing people in caves, and that the
entire search for terrorists would be a
complete fraud, and Rockefeller was
laughing like it was a funny joke!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o11YmQ7-Ld8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rd9McZFN6bg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=styYIG-fiEc&mode=related&search=

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2007/151007_b_verichip.htm

Aaron Russo recently died of cancer,
so these were his last interviews, when
he decided to tell all about the elites'
plans for a "new world order" where
most people will be microchipped with
an RFID chip.

2007-10-19 01:15:03 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

Do your own research into what
happened on 9/11

http://www.prisonplanet.com/911.html

http://www.truth911.net

http://www.belowgroundsurface.org

Learn about all the MOLTEN STEEL
that was found at Ground Zero, which
stayed red hot (over 600 C) for over 6
weeks after 9/11 - something that can't
be explained by jet fuel fires which only
burn at under 600 C in open air because
steel melts at temperatures over 1532 C
(melting point temperature of iron).

Watch these videos showing molten
metal pouring out of the South Tower
just minutes before its collapse. You will
see bright orange/yellow hot liquid metal
pouring out of the South Tower, from
amateur videos, and even ABC News
footage. This is not Aluminium
because in molten form, Aluminium
looks silvery / grey. This is not
office materials on fire, because
no such materials get this hot and
can behave like a liquid (except plastic)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qa7PN-8T2VY

http://911weknow.com

2007-10-19 01:24:01 · update #1

More evidence of Molten Metal on 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JithuVAIb7Y

Evidence that Building 7 had been
pre-planted with controlled demolition
charges BEFORE the planes hit on 9/11

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZ9BofDUXv0

Remeber that NO JET PLANE hit WTC7
(a 47 storey skyscraper), but building 7
collapsed completely about 7 hours after
the Twin Towers fell. It only suffered
small fires on a few levels, but it waited
7 hours to implode on itself and collapse
at FREE-FALL speeds, just like classic
controlled demolition buildings!???

No highrise steel-framed building had
ever collapsed due to fire and gravity
alone in the entire history of civil
engineering construction. NONE! The
only buildings that have been said to
collapse completely due to air fires, are
the 3 WTC buildings that fell on 9/11.

Does that sound fishy to you?

Do your own independent investigations.

http://www.journalof911studies.org

http://physics911.net

2007-10-19 01:37:16 · update #2

17 answers

To answer the points you raised.

1. There is no reputable source to confirm the Rockefeller story. It's a made-up "fact"

2. No molten metal was definitely found. There might have been some molten aluminum. There is no reputable source for this conjecture (not Youtube or Prison Planet)

3. The orange-yellow stuff appears to be molten aluminum with burning debris. Most hydrocarbons burn with an orange flame. Means nothing. See NIST at
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

4. The buildings did not fall at free fall speeds.

The fall time was analyzed by NIST (National Institute of Science & Technology) , which used seismic recorders & other techniques to measure the fall time. Their results:

a) The exterior panels took 9-11 seconds. They fell this fast because they were not impeded by anything & this is perfectly normal.

b) The inner parts of WTC 1&2 (roughly 60 stories of WTC 1 and 40 stories of WTC 2) stood 15 to 25 seconds after collapse initiation before they, too, began to collapse. This is far slower than a free-fall.

You can read this in NIST’s own words at Point 6 at http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

5. Whether or not any steel-frame building ever collapsed from fire alone is irrelevant to the Twin Tower collapse.

The towers mainly collapsed due to the large number of supports being knocked out by the jets. The remaining supports had to bear the weight, almost to their load limit.

As NIST (National Institute of Science & Technology) says:

"About 60% of the 60 columns of the impacted face of framed-tube were severed, and many more were significantly deflected. This caused stress redistribution, which significantly increased the load of some columns, near the load capacity for some of them."

The remaining supports were holding up about 200,000 tons. The fires weakened them, causing them to sag under this pressure until supports broke & collapse began.

6. The fact that WTC7 collapsed even though it wasn’t hit by the planes is not surprising.

Even though they were NOT hit by the jets, numerous buildings over a wide area were hit by debris from the collapsing towers were destroyed.

This includes: The Marriott World Trade Center , 6 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, 4 World Trade Center, and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church (which wasn’t even in the WTC complex). The Deutsche Bank Building was also outside the WTC complex & was massively damaged, and was declared a total loss in 2004.

As for WTC 7:
According to NIST "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." See http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=5#wtc7)

2007-10-19 07:38:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Yes, there was once talents that anything was once going to occur. The main points weren't transparent as to in which, detailed date, what kind of terror was once going to be unleashed on America. Since they did not understand simply what was once going to occur, despite the fact that they did understand in which, New York City is a massive situation, one might clearly feel it might be executive structures or officers that have been going to be the goal, certainly not did someone have a clue as to what was once particularly going to occur. We particularly are not able to lay the entire blame on Bush for this one, it might have occurred regardless of who was once President. The crisis here's that we do not appear to be any longer ready now than we have been then, although we did manipulate to quit the shootings at Fort Dix! It was once an on going research that a civilian stated to the FBI, that tipped them off. For a few purpose Our executive does not appear to be ready to clear up too many threats on their possess, possibly its time to do a little crisis fixing from inside.

2016-09-05 15:12:14 · answer #2 · answered by vanterpool 4 · 0 0

Is all this 9-1-1 conspiracy crap you're constantly ranting about some kind of sexual substitute for you? Try a good dose of Viagra and see if that doesn't help you join the real world.

2007-10-20 15:16:01 · answer #3 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 3 0

Did you know that John Hinkley Jr. shot Ronald Reagan because he thought that Gary Cooper was a better actor?

2007-10-19 01:34:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 3 0

The part that makes everything this guy said illegit is "HOLLYWOOD PRODUCER."

The word of a petty movie maker that is extremely liberal is not as good as an even remotely neutral "elite" as you put it.

You've been corrupted by American terrorists...

By the way, I have a question for you too:

Did you know that your head needs the most powerful catscan in history?

2007-10-19 01:23:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 8 0

Another RANT from the Conspiracy Theorists,

I suppose G.W.B. will be accused of having Aaron Russo, bumped off as well because he knew too much!!

2007-10-19 01:23:53 · answer #6 · answered by conranger1 7 · 10 0

and you believed this nonsense.

Care to invest in some Florida "land"? Protected view of the bay with direct water access suitable for small craft. Wildlife abounds in this pristine area.

2007-10-19 01:21:27 · answer #7 · answered by Spock (rhp) 7 · 9 0

Youtube what a reliable source you have there...sorry troll no sale on the BS you are trying to pass off.

2007-10-19 02:34:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 0

To answer your question, no I didn't know. Probably because its conspiracy theory for people who have to much time on their hands. Get back to work ya slacker!

2007-10-19 01:30:02 · answer #9 · answered by B. Wags 3 · 7 0

The idiotic conspiracy theory.
Man, you're in outer space.

2007-10-20 15:36:56 · answer #10 · answered by R.D.W. 2 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers