i was interviewed by the police recently and my guilt it seems rested on a question of a date an important detail turning a non important act into a more important one, the other person involved had knowingly lied to the police in their statement to cover there tracks, i asked the question during the interview about the facts but was told that the person in question must have been confused, but this person suffers from OCD and keeps all information of this type in files, he also seemed quite exact about the rest of his information why would the police not investigate the statement of the other, is this 'impartiality' and can i now ask the police to look at the statement of the other as on hear say i now have a caution (it was not that serious an offence) on my otherwise clean criminal record and the other has nothing but satisfaction and in fairness the police know that with this type of lie in another situation peoples lives could be ruined..
thanks
2007-10-18
18:40:25
·
6 answers
·
asked by
anthony c
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law Enforcement & Police