Ron Paul is the only Presidential candidate to take a stand against illegal immigration; Not only that...He wants to withdraw from NAFTA (North America Fair Trade Agreement)
...This is a step in the right direction to put a stop to illegal immigration
2007-10-18 16:14:35 · 17 answers · asked by GUARD DOG 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I will be, I might not agree with him on a few issues, but I believe he at least will do things for the good of the people and not for the good of special interest groups and lobbyists.
I'm sick of all the lies and back room deals that has dominated the whorehouse for so long. Unless some other candidate pops up some where that is believable he's got my vote.
add - If Dr. Paul was truly a nut he would be on TV more, take a look back, Ross Perot was all over the media as a joke, on the subject of Ron Paul we have silence. Forbes was also in the news when he ran, he was also a long shot that no one took seriously.
The REAL reason Ron Paul is avoided and ridiculed is because he IS the only one that will do anything about the immigration problem and withdraw from Nafta and other disastrous free trade agreements. That goes against the plan for the NAU doesn't it?
Take a close look at all the front running candidates and see how they stand on the issue, either they are for it, silent or saying they are opposed but voting in it's favor.
2007-10-18 16:22:33 · answer #1 · answered by Drixnot 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I hope so. I am still researching his positions, such as the imminent deployment of troops to Iran by W and what he (Dr. Paul ) can do, would do or should do to derail that effort. With Russia now supporting Iran and technical help from China, the cold war is here again. The Turks will go into Iraq, and tell the USA to stop using Turkey bases and airspace to attack Iraq insurgents. The Iranians meanwhile support the Kurds the Turks want to attack, so the Iranians, with help from the Russians may attack Turkey to get to all that oil in the Caspian sea and to allow the Russians to have a warm water port for their navy. W can't get his brain around anything else but attack attack attack - Hillary wants to stay in Iraq until 2013, and there are really no other strong dems or repubs thinking outside the box.
2007-10-18 16:23:42 · answer #2 · answered by commonsense 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋
confident, i'm excited for replace and delighted to have greater applicants. i'm not sure yet reviewing / gaining expertise of roughly each and every of them. I do pray we for the day while , we we now no longer might desire to chosen the lesser of two evils and have somebody solid , we choose and are excitied approximately and how is worked up approximately his job / needs it and might do it . he's have been given to be waiting to steer . this could be a he/ she / any race ... i choose the the perfect option candidate who can do the job. we are truly at a transition , and we choose the the perfect option management to make / destroy this usa. I concern we are able to be broken / usa 's greenback is susceptible , financial device hit no longer easy. we are actually not solid. we are falling and quickly .
2016-10-13 03:35:48 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO and I would like his supporters to indicate which party they would have supported if they choose to write him in as a candidate, because he will NOT be on any ticket.
That way we will know which party he hurt the most.
2007-10-19 15:31:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I like Ron Paul's limitations on Federal spending.
However, for the preservation of my Nation, I will end up willingly voting for the leading Non-Marxist.
2007-10-18 16:36:03 · answer #5 · answered by Boomer Wisdom 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yes , he is the only one that won't crawl in bet with Corporate America and wants to give America back to the people .
2007-10-18 17:40:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Very doubtful that I would vote for Ron Paul. He's about eighty years (and at least seventeen amendments) behind in times in most of his politics.
2007-10-18 16:20:36 · answer #7 · answered by wichitaor1 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
What is it 1% of the electorate?
I am no fan of CIA and FBI , but we do need them!
They should not be political tools !
2007-10-18 16:17:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I think anyone who has already decided this far out from the elections who they're voting for is immature and short-sighted. Oh, I'm voting for Stephen Colbert.
2007-10-18 16:17:50 · answer #9 · answered by toblerone.king 2 · 5⤊ 5⤋
No, thank you. He's only slight less nutty than Ross Perot.
2007-10-18 16:22:16 · answer #10 · answered by Resident Heretic 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋